“As a witness at George Pell’s trial, I saw first-hand the strength of his victim”, Australian Broadcasting Corporation
By Louise Milligan, Analysis, August 21, 2019
In the end, just as in the beginning, this was a case about two little boys.
Two 13-year-old choristers from humble backgrounds, who received scholarships to an expensive Catholic school because they could sing their little hearts out.
Two boys whose childhoods, a court has again found, were stolen from them in 1996 by a man who was supposed to represent all that was good in the world: the then Archbishop of Melbourne.
Neither chorister was in court this brisk Melbourne morning.
One succumbed in 2014 to the heroin addiction that overwhelmed him from the age of 14 — the year after the event that changed their lives.
He was only 31 when he died.
The other choirboy remained silent about what George Pell did to them until his friend’s death.
Then, four years ago, with private and resolute determination, he told his truth to Victoria Police.
Today, beamed to the world through a scratchy feed from a Supreme Court building several blocks away from where the boy was orally raped at St Patrick’s Cathedral, Melbourne, two judges of the Victorian Court of Appeal agreed with a jury of 12 that this young man was a truth-teller.
That finding meant Cardinal George Pell’s appeal was dismissed.
The world’s third most-senior Catholic will return to prison.
‘Someone who was telling the truth’
“Throughout his evidence, [the complainant, known only to the court as ‘J’] came across as someone who was telling the truth,” Chief Justice Anne Ferguson and Justice Chris Maxwell found in their majority judgment.
“He did not seek to embellish his evidence or tailor it in a manner favourable to the prosecution.”
As the only journalist who has met J and other complainants against George Pell, and who wrote about these allegations in my book, Cardinal, The Rise and Fall of George Pell, I do not speak for J as he is fiercely private.
But I can comfortably say that their Honours’ finding is not a surprise to me.
I have never had any reason to believe that J is not telling the truth.
Indeed, I have often said I would defy anyone who had met him to find any reason why this young man would invent this story and to go through what has been a four-year ordeal through the police investigation and a court case.
He released a statement today through his lawyer, Dr Viv Waller, who acted pro bono for him during this process.
“The journey has taken me to places that, in my darkest moments, I feared I would not return from,” J wrote.
“The justice machine rolls on, with all of its processes and punditry, almost forgetting about the people at the heart of the matter.”
It was a characteristically measured statement, too, with J saying he appreciated that the criminal process had afforded Pell “every opportunity to challenge the charges and every opportunity to be heard”.
“I am glad he has had the best legal representation that money can buy. There are lots of checks and balances in the criminal justice system.”
The trauma can’t be underestimated
It’s the ultimate David and Goliath tale of a young man who never sought fame, just wanted justice, against a well-resourced defendant who has for years cultivated and been supported by the powerful.
Imagine taking on Cardinal George Pell: the third most senior person in the worldwide Catholic Church. A man supported by two former prime ministers who didn’t spend a minute in court, didn’t hear or read a word of your evidence and yet nonetheless, by implication, branded you a liar.
- Inside the courtroom where George Pell’s appeal was rejected
- The four legal principles that led to Cardinal Pell’s appeal failing
- This is the reasoning a Victorian court gave for dismissing George Pell’s appeal
- Priest calls on church to accept Pell decision and concentrate on victims
- ‘My journey has not been an easy one’: Pell victim responds to verdict
- As a witness at George Pell’s trial, I saw first-hand the strength of his victim
- George Pell likely to be jailed with former friend, notorious paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale
The trauma and anxiety for all involved — J, the family of his dead friend, the entire community of people who have survived industrial-scale abuse by Catholic clergy in this country — cannot be underestimated.
As someone who became a witness in this case — I was cross-examined for a full day by Pell’s combative QC, Robert Richter — I can attest that this process is brutal and one you would be mad to seek out for any other reason than that you spoke the truth.
And I am not, like J, a child rape survivor.
I am not, like J, grieving a friend who was also abused by a powerful man the day I was raped.
I am not, like J, someone who has been falsely accused of trying to do this for my own personal gain.
“Nothing could be further from the truth,” J said in his statement about claims he was somehow after compensation.
“I have risked my privacy, my health, my wellbeing and my family.
“I have not instructed any solicitor in relation to a claim for compensation.
“This is not about money and it never has been.”
VIDEO: VICTORIAN CHIEF JUSTICE SAYS PELL “IS NOT TO BE MADE A SCAPEGOAT” (ABC NEWS)