{"id":10751,"date":"2020-09-19T06:47:02","date_gmt":"2020-09-19T13:47:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/?p=10751"},"modified":"2020-09-19T06:47:02","modified_gmt":"2020-09-19T13:47:02","slug":"ruth-bader-ginsburg-supreme-courts-feminist-icon-is-dead-at-87-the-new-york-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/?p=10751","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Supreme Court\u2019s Feminist Icon, Is Dead at 87&#8221;, The New York Times"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By <span class=\"css-1baulvz last-byline\">Linda Greenhouse, headline story, September 19, 2020<\/span><\/p>\n<p><em>The second woman appointed to the Supreme Court, Justice Ginsburg\u2019s pointed and powerful dissenting opinions earned her late-life rock stardom.<\/em><\/p>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-n27z15\">\n<div class=\"css-mm3pwi\">\n<div class=\"css-1g7y0i5 e1drnplw0\">\n<div class=\"css-f2fzwx e1drnplw2\">\n<section class=\"meteredContent css-1r7ky0e\">\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\"><a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/09\/18\/us\/rbg-accomplishments.html\">Ruth Bader Ginsburg<\/a>, the second woman to serve on the Supreme Court and a pioneering advocate for women\u2019s rights, who in her ninth decade became a much younger generation\u2019s unlikely cultural icon, died at her home in Washington on Friday. She was 87.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">The cause was complications of metastatic pancreatic cancer, the Supreme Court said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">By the time two small tumors were found in one of her lungs in December 2018, during a follow-up scan for broken ribs suffered in a recent fall, Justice Ginsburg had beaten colon cancer in 1999 and early-stage pancreatic cancer 10 years later. She received a coronary stent to clear a blocked artery in 2014.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Barely five feet tall and weighing 100 pounds, Justice Ginsburg drew comments for years on her fragile appearance. But she was tough, working out regularly with a trainer, who published a book about his famous client\u2019s challenging exercise regime.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">As Justice Ginsburg passed her 80th birthday and 20th anniversary on the Supreme Court bench during President Barack Obama\u2019s second term, she shrugged off a chorus of calls for her to retire in order to give a Democratic president the chance to name her replacement. She planned to stay \u201cas long as I can do the job full steam,\u201d <a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2013\/08\/25\/us\/court-is-one-of-most-activist-ginsburg-says-vowing-to-stay.html?pagewanted=all&amp;module=inline\">she would say<\/a>, sometimes adding, \u201cThere will be a president after this one, and I\u2019m hopeful that that president will be a fine president.\u201dWhen Justice Sandra Day O\u2019Connor retired in January 2006, Justice Ginsburg was for a time the only woman on the Supreme Court \u2014 hardly a testament to the revolution in the legal status of women that she had helped bring about in her career as a litigator and strategist.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Her years as the solitary female justice were \u201cthe worst times,\u201d she recalled <a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/newrepublic.com\/article\/119578\/ruth-bader-ginsburg-interview-retirement-feminists-jazzercise\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">in a 2014 interview<\/a>. \u201cThe image to the public entering the courtroom was eight men, of a certain size, and then this little woman sitting to the side. That was not a good image for the public to see.\u201d Eventually she was joined by two other women, both named by Mr. Obama: Sonia Sotomayor in 2009 and Elena Kagan in 2010.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\"><picture><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"css-1m50asq\" src=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2013\/08\/25\/us\/JP-GINSBURG\/JP-GINSBURG-articleLarge-v3.jpg?quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;disable=upscale\" sizes=\"((min-width: 600px) and (max-width: 1004px)) 84vw, (min-width: 1005px) 60vw, 100vw\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2013\/08\/25\/us\/JP-GINSBURG\/JP-GINSBURG-articleLarge-v3.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 600w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2013\/08\/25\/us\/JP-GINSBURG\/JP-GINSBURG-jumbo-v3.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 1024w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2013\/08\/25\/us\/JP-GINSBURG\/JP-GINSBURG-superJumbo-v3.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 2048w\" alt=\"Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2013 in her chambers. She once said that her years as the solitary female justice were \u201cthe worst times.\u201d\" \/><\/picture><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-79elbk\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-wrapper\">\n<div class=\"css-1a48zt4 ehw59r15\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-children\">\n<figure class=\"css-jcw7oy e1g7ppur0\"><figcaption class=\"css-1l44abu ewdxa0s0\"><span class=\"css-16f3y1r e13ogyst0\">Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 2013 in her chambers. She once said that her years as the solitary female justice were \u201cthe worst times.\u201d<\/span><span class=\"css-cnj6d5 e1z0qqy90\"><span class=\"css-1ly73wi e1tej78p0\">Credit&#8230;<\/span>Todd Heisler\/The New York Times<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">After the 2010 retirement of Justice John Paul Stevens, whom Justice Kagan succeeded, Justice Ginsburg became the senior member and de facto leader of a four-justice liberal bloc, consisting of the three female justices and Justice Stephen G. Breyer. Unless they could attract a fifth vote, which Justice Anthony M. Kennedy provided on increasingly rare occasions before his retirement in 2018, the four were often in dissent on the ideologically polarized court.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Justice Ginsburg\u2019s pointed and powerful dissenting opinions, usually speaking for all four, attracted growing attention as the court turned further to the right. A law student, Shana Knizhnik, anointed her the Notorious R.B.G., a play on the name of the Notorious B.I.G., a famous rapper who was Brooklyn-born, like the justice. Soon the name, and Justice Ginsburg\u2019s image \u2014 her expression serene yet severe, a frilly lace collar adorning her black judicial robe, her eyes framed by oversize glasses and a gold crown perched at a rakish angle on her head \u2014 became an internet sensation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Young women had the image tattooed on their arms; daughters were dressed in R.B.G. costumes for Halloween. \u201cYou Can\u2019t Spell Truth Without Ruth\u201d appeared on bumper stickers and T-shirts. A biography, \u201cNotorious RBG: The Life and Times of Ruth Bader Ginsburg,\u201d by Irin Carmon and Ms. Knizhnik, reached the best-seller list the day after its publication in 2015, and the next year Simon &amp; Schuster brought out a Ginsburg biography for children with the title \u201cI Dissent.\u201d A documentary film of her life was a surprise box office hit in the summer of 2018, and a Hollywood biopic centered on her first sex discrimination court case opened on Christmas Day that year.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">The adulation accelerated after the election of Donald J. Trump, whom Justice Ginsburg had had the indiscretion to call \u201ca faker\u201d in an interview during the 2016 presidential campaign. (She later said her comment <a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2016\/07\/15\/us\/politics\/ruth-bader-ginsburg-donald-trump.html\">had been \u201cill advised.\u201d<\/a>) Scholars of the culture searched for an explanation for the phenomenon. Dahlia Lithwick, writing in The Atlantic in early 2019, offered this observation: \u201cToday, more than ever, women starved for models of female influence, authenticity, dignity, and voice hold up an octogenarian justice as the embodiment of hope for an empowered future.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"css-8h527k\">\n<div data-testid=\"lazyimage-container\"><picture class=\"css-1j5kxti\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"css-1m50asq\" src=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ZH1T\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ZH1T-articleLarge-v2.jpg?quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;disable=upscale\" sizes=\"((min-width: 600px) and (max-width: 1004px)) 84vw, (min-width: 1005px) 80vw, 100vw\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ZH1T\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ZH1T-articleLarge-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 600w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ZH1T\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ZH1T-jumbo-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 1024w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ZH1T\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ZH1T-superJumbo-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 2048w\" alt=\"President Bill Clinton with Justice Ginsburg in 1993, when he nominated her to the Supreme Court.\" \/><\/picture><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-79elbk\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-wrapper\">\n<div class=\"css-1a48zt4 ehw59r15\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-children\">\n<figure class=\"css-1ef8w8q e1g7ppur0\"><figcaption class=\"css-18crmh6 ewdxa0s0\"><span class=\"css-16f3y1r e13ogyst0\">President Bill Clinton with Justice Ginsburg in 1993, when he nominated her to the Supreme Court.<\/span><span class=\"css-cnj6d5 e1z0qqy90\"><span class=\"css-1ly73wi e1tej78p0\">Credit&#8230;<\/span>Doug Mills\/Associated Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Her late-life rock stardom could not remotely have been predicted in June 1993, when President Bill Clinton <a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1993\/06\/15\/us\/supreme-court-overview-clinton-names-ruth-ginsburg-advocate-for-women-court.html\">nominated the soft-spoken, 60-year-old judge<\/a>, who prized collegiality and whose friendship with conservative colleagues on the federal appeals court where she had served for 13 years left some feminist leaders fretting privately that the president was making a mistake. Mr. Clinton chose her to succeed Justice Byron R. White, an appointee of President John F. Kennedy, who was retiring after 31 years. Her Senate confirmation seven weeks later, by a vote of 96 to 3, ended a drought in Democratic appointments to the Supreme Court that extended back to President Lyndon B. Johnson\u2019s nomination of Thurgood Marshall 26 years earlier.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">There was something fitting about that sequence, because Ruth Ginsburg was occasionally described as the Thurgood Marshall of the women\u2019s rights movement by those who remembered her days as a litigator and director of the Women\u2019s Rights Project of the American Civil Liberties Union during the 1970s.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">The analogy was based on her sense of strategy and careful selection of cases as she persuaded the all-male Supreme Court, one case at a time, to start recognizing the constitutional barrier against discrimination on the basis of sex. The young Thurgood Marshall had done much the same as the civil rights movement\u2019s chief legal strategist in building the case against racial segregation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<h2 id=\"link-537ab6a0\" class=\"css-1aoo5yy eoo0vm40\">Early Legal Landmarks<\/h2>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">When Ruth Ginsburg arrived to take her junior justice\u2019s seat at the far end of the Supreme Court\u2019s bench on the first Monday of October 1993, the setting was familiar even if the view was different. She had previously stood on the other side of that bench, arguing cases that were to become legal landmarks. She presented six cases to the court from 1973 to 1978, winning five.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Her goal \u2014 to persuade the Supreme Court that the 14th Amendment\u2019s guarantee of equal protection applied not only to racial discrimination but to sex discrimination as well \u2014 was a daunting one. The Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren, famous for its liberal rulings across a variety of constitutional fronts, had never recognized sex discrimination as a matter of constitutional concern. The Supreme Court under Chief Justice Warren E. Burger, who was appointed by President Richard Nixon in 1969, figured to be no more hospitable.<\/p>\n<div class=\"css-8h527k\">\n<div data-testid=\"lazyimage-container\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"css-1m50asq\" src=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2015\/11\/15\/fashion\/15TABLEJP3\/15TABLEJP3-articleLarge-v2.jpg?quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;disable=upscale\" sizes=\"((min-width: 600px) and (max-width: 1004px)) 84vw, (min-width: 1005px) 80vw, 100vw\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2015\/11\/15\/fashion\/15TABLEJP3\/15TABLEJP3-articleLarge-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 600w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2015\/11\/15\/fashion\/15TABLEJP3\/15TABLEJP3-jumbo-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 1024w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2015\/11\/15\/fashion\/15TABLEJP3\/15TABLEJP3-superJumbo-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 2048w\" alt=\"Ms. Ginsburg in 1972. She became the first tenured female professor at Columbia Law School before moving on to the United States Court of Appeals and then the Supreme Court.\" \/><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-79elbk\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-wrapper\">\n<div class=\"css-1a48zt4 ehw59r15\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-children\">\n<figure class=\"css-1ef8w8q e1g7ppur0\"><figcaption class=\"css-18crmh6 ewdxa0s0\"><span class=\"css-16f3y1r e13ogyst0\">Ms. Ginsburg in 1972. She became the first tenured female professor at Columbia Law School before moving on to the United States Court of Appeals and then the Supreme Court.<\/span><span class=\"css-cnj6d5 e1z0qqy90\"><span class=\"css-1ly73wi e1tej78p0\">Credit&#8230;<\/span>Librado Romero\/The New York Times<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Ms. Ginsburg started from the premise that she needed to provide some basic education for an audience that was not so much hostile as uncomprehending. She took aim at laws that were ostensibly intended to protect women \u2014 laws based on stereotyped notions of male and female abilities and needs.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">\u201cThe justices did not comprehend the differential treatment of men and women in jury selection and other legal contexts as in any sense burdensome to women,\u201d she said in a 1988 speech. She added: \u201cFrom a justice\u2019s own situation in life and attendant perspective, his immediate reaction to a gender discrimination challenge would likely be: But I treat my wife and daughters so well, with such indulgence. To turn in a new direction, the court first had to gain an understanding that legislation apparently designed to benefit or protect women could have the opposite effect.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"css-8h527k\">\n<div data-testid=\"lazyimage-container\"><picture class=\"css-1j5kxti\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"css-1m50asq\" src=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ACRR\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ACRR-articleLarge-v3.jpg?quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;disable=upscale\" sizes=\"((min-width: 600px) and (max-width: 1004px)) 84vw, (min-width: 1005px) 60vw, 100vw\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ACRR\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ACRR-articleLarge-v3.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 600w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ACRR\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ACRR-jumbo-v3.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 723w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ACRR\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-ACRR-superJumbo-v3.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 1446w\" alt=\"Ms. Ginsburg in 1993 with her grandchildren Clara Spera and Paul Spera.\" \/><\/picture><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-79elbk\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-wrapper\">\n<div class=\"css-1a48zt4 ehw59r15\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-children\">\n<figure class=\"css-ujjex e1g7ppur0\"><figcaption class=\"css-1l44abu ewdxa0s0\"><span class=\"css-16f3y1r e13ogyst0\">Ms. Ginsburg in 1993 with her grandchildren Clara Spera and Paul Spera.<\/span><span class=\"css-cnj6d5 e1z0qqy90\"><span class=\"css-1ly73wi e1tej78p0\">Credit&#8230;<\/span>Reuters<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">So there was a successful challenge to an Idaho law that gave men preference over women to be chosen to administer estates, a practice the state had defended as being based on men\u2019s greater familiarity with the world of business (Reed v. Reed, 1971). There was a case challenging a military regulation that denied husbands of women in the military some of the benefits to which wives of male soldiers were entitled, on the assumption that a man was not likely to be the dependent spouse (Frontiero v. Richardson, 1973).<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Another case challenged a Social Security provision that assumed wives were secondary breadwinners whose incomes were unimportant to the family and therefore deprived widowers of survivor benefits (Weinberger v. Wiesenfeld, 1975). In that case, as in several others, the plaintiff was a man. Stephen Wiesenfeld\u2019s wife, Paula, had died in childbirth, and he sought the benefits so he could stay home and raise their child, Jason. After the Supreme Court victory, Ms. Ginsburg stayed in touch with the father and child, and in 1998 she traveled to Florida to help officiate at Jason\u2019s wedding. In 2014, in a ceremony at the Supreme Court 42 years after Paula Wiesenfeld\u2019s death, Justice Ginsburg presided over her one-time client\u2019s second marriage.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">In a 1976 case, Craig v. Boren, which Ms. Ginsburg worked on but did not personally argue, the Supreme Court for the first time formally adopted the rule that official distinctions based on sex were subject to \u201cheightened scrutiny\u201d from the courts. In that case, the court struck down an Oklahoma law that permitted girls to buy beer at age 18 but required boys to wait until they were 21.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">The precise question the court addressed in Craig v. Boren may not have been profound, but the constitutional consequences of the answer certainly were. Although the court never adopted the rule of \u201cstrict scrutiny\u201d that Ms. Ginsburg argued for in her early cases, instead reserving that most burdensome judicial test essentially for race discrimination, the initially reluctant justices had clearly embraced the conclusion that the 14th Amendment\u2019s guarantee of equal protection included equality of the sexes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"css-1m50asq\" src=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-09B2\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-09B2-articleLarge-v3.jpg?quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;disable=upscale\" sizes=\"((min-width: 600px) and (max-width: 1004px)) 84vw, (min-width: 1005px) 80vw, 100vw\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-09B2\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-09B2-articleLarge-v3.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 600w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-09B2\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-09B2-jumbo-v3.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 1024w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-09B2\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-09B2-superJumbo-v3.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 2048w\" alt=\"Justice Ginsburg, right, with, from left, Justices John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O\u2019Connor, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas descending the steps of the Supreme Court to watch the casket procession for Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist in 2005.\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-79elbk\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-wrapper\">\n<div class=\"css-1a48zt4 ehw59r15\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-children\">\n<figure class=\"css-1ef8w8q e1g7ppur0\"><figcaption class=\"css-18crmh6 ewdxa0s0\"><span class=\"css-16f3y1r e13ogyst0\">Justice Ginsburg, right, with, from left, Justices John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O\u2019Connor, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas descending the steps of the Supreme Court to watch the casket procession for Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist in 2005.<\/span><span class=\"css-cnj6d5 e1z0qqy90\"><span class=\"css-1ly73wi e1tej78p0\">Credit&#8230;<\/span>Doug Mills\/The New York Times<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">It was a moment of personal triumph, therefore, when nearly 20 years after making her last argument before the Supreme Court, Justice Ginsburg announced the court\u2019s majority opinion in a 1996 discrimination case involving the Virginia Military Institute in Lexington. By a lopsided 7 to 1, the court had found that the all-male admissions policy of a state-supported military college was unconstitutional.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Virginia had argued that its \u201cadversative\u201d method of educating young men to be citizen-soldiers through a physically challenging curriculum was unsuited for young women. Under legal pressure, the state had set up an alternative military college for women \u2014 less rigorous and notably lacking the powerful alumni network that conferred substantial advantages on V.M.I. graduates.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">That was not good enough, <a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1996\/06\/27\/us\/supreme-court-excerpts-high-court-s-ruling-against-male-only-policy-vmi.html\">Justice Ginsburg wrote for the majority<\/a>in United States v. Virginia. She explained that the state had failed to provide the \u201cexceedingly persuasive justification\u201d that the Constitution required for treating men and women differently. \u201cWomen seeking and fit for a V.M.I.-quality education cannot be offered anything less under the state\u2019s obligation to afford them genuinely equal protection,\u201d she wrote, adding, \u201cGeneralizations about \u2018the way women are,\u2019 estimates of what is appropriate for most women, no longer justify denying opportunity to women whose talent and capacity place them outside the average description.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">In this majority opinion, the most important of her tenure, Justice Ginsburg took pains to make clear that the Constitution did not require ignoring all differences between the sexes. \u201cInherent differences between men and women, we have come to appreciate, remain cause for celebration,\u201d she wrote, \u201cbut not for denigration of the members of either sex or for artificial constraints on an individual\u2019s opportunity.\u201d Any differential treatment, she emphasized, must not \u201ccreate or perpetuate the legal, social, and economic inferiority of women.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">In August 2018, Justice Ginsburg visited the Virginia Military Institute for the first time and addressed the corps of cadets, which included nearly 200 women among the student body of 1,700. She knew that her decision \u201cwould make V.M.I. a better place,\u201d she told cadets.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">On June 26, 1996, as Justice Ginsburg delivered her opinion in the V.M.I. case, there was a subtext, not necessarily apparent to the courtroom audience. She described the moment in a speech the following year to the Women\u2019s Bar Association in Washington: how she had glanced across the bench to her colleague, Justice O\u2019Connor, who herself had helped weave the legal fabric that supported the V.M.I. decision. Justice O\u2019Connor, early in her tenure as the first woman on the Supreme Court, had written a majority opinion that ordered an all-female state nursing school in Mississippi to admit men, warning against using \u201carchaic and stereotypic notions\u201d about the proper roles for men and women. Justice O\u2019Connor\u2019s opinion in that 1982 case relied on the Supreme Court precedents that Ruth Ginsburg\u2019s cases had set. And Justice Ginsburg\u2019s opinion in the V.M.I. case in turn cited Justice O\u2019Connor\u2019s 1982 opinion, Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan. The constitutional circle was closed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">The two justices, three years apart in age, with Justice O\u2019Connor the elder, were among the first generation of women to make their way into the highest levels of a legal profession that was hardly waiting to welcome them. Justice O\u2019Connor was offered nothing but secretarial jobs after graduating among the top students in her class at Stanford University\u2019s law school. Justice Ginsburg, one of nine women in her Harvard Law School class of 552, was a law review editor and outstanding student who was recommended by one of her professors for a position as a law clerk to Justice Felix Frankfurter. The professor, Albert Sacks, who later became dean of the law school, wrote to Justice Frankfurter, a former Harvard law professor, that \u201cthe lady has extraordinary self-possession\u201d and that \u201cher qualities of mind and person would make her most attractive to you as a law clerk.\u201d The justice, who had never hired a woman, declined to invite the star student for an interview.<\/p>\n<div class=\"css-8h527k\">\n<div data-testid=\"lazyimage-container\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"css-1m50asq\" src=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-CM7K\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-CM7K-articleLarge-v2.jpg?quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;disable=upscale\" sizes=\"((min-width: 600px) and (max-width: 1004px)) 84vw, (min-width: 1005px) 80vw, 100vw\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-CM7K\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-CM7K-articleLarge-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 600w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-CM7K\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-CM7K-jumbo-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 1024w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-CM7K\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-CM7K-superJumbo-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 2048w\" alt=\"Justices O\u2019Connor and Ginsburg in 2001. When Justice O\u2019Connor retired in January 2006, Justice Ginsburg was for a while the only woman on the Supreme Court.\" \/><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-79elbk\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-wrapper\">\n<div class=\"css-1a48zt4 ehw59r15\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-children\">\n<figure class=\"css-1ef8w8q e1g7ppur0\"><figcaption class=\"css-18crmh6 ewdxa0s0\"><span class=\"css-16f3y1r e13ogyst0\">Justices O\u2019Connor and Ginsburg in 2001. When Justice O\u2019Connor retired in January 2006, Justice Ginsburg was for a while the only woman on the Supreme Court.<\/span><span class=\"css-cnj6d5 e1z0qqy90\"><span class=\"css-1ly73wi e1tej78p0\">Credit&#8230;<\/span>David Hume Kennerly\/Getty Images<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Their common life experience gave the two women a bond that appeared to grow in intensity despite their opposing views on such important areas of the court\u2019s docket as affirmative action and federalism, and despite their very different origins: one the daughter of Southwestern ranchers and the other the Brooklyn-born daughter of Russian Jews.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"link-37a254a8\" class=\"css-1aoo5yy eoo0vm40\">Shopkeepers<\/h2>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Ruth\u2019s father, Nathan Bader, immigrated to New York with his family when he was 13. Her mother, the former Celia Amster, was born four months after her family\u2019s own arrival. Ruth, who was named Joan Ruth at birth and whose childhood nickname was Kiki, was born on March 15, 1933. She grew up in Brooklyn\u2019s Flatbush neighborhood essentially as an only child; an older sister died of meningitis at the age of 6 when Ruth was 14 months old. The family owned small retail stores, including a fur store and a hat shop. Money was never plentiful.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Celia Bader was an intellectually ambitious woman who graduated from high school at 15 but had not been able to go to college; her family sent her to work in Manhattan\u2019s garment district so her brother could attend Cornell University. She had high ambitions for her daughter but did not live to see them fulfilled. She was found to have cervical cancer when Ruth was a freshman at James Madison High School, and she died at the age of 47 in 1950, on the day before her daughter\u2019s high school graduation. After the graduation ceremony that Ruth was unable to attend, her teachers brought her many medals and awards to the house.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">On June 14, 1993, when Judge Ginsburg stood with Mr. Clinton in the Rose Garden for the announcement of her Supreme Court nomination, <a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1993\/06\/15\/us\/supreme-court-overview-clinton-names-ruth-ginsburg-advocate-for-women-court.html\">she brought tears<\/a> to the president\u2019s eyes with a tribute to her mother. \u201cI pray that I may be all that she would have been had she lived in an age when women could aspire and achieve and daughters are cherished as much as sons,\u201d she said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Ruth Bader attended Cornell on a scholarship. During her freshman year, she met a sophomore, Martin Ginsburg. For the 17-year-old Ruth, the attraction was immediate. \u201cHe was the only boy I ever met who cared that I had a brain,\u201d she said frequently in later years. By her junior year, they were engaged, and they married after her graduation in 1954. Theirs was a lifelong romantic and intellectual partnership. In outward respects, they were opposites. While she was reserved, choosing her words carefully, with long pauses between sentences that left some conversation partners unnerved, he was an ebullient raconteur, quick with a joke of which he himself was often the butt. The depth of their bond, and their mutual commitment to treating their family and careers as a shared enterprise, was nonetheless apparent to all who knew them as a couple.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Mr. Ginsburg, a highly successful tax lawyer, would become his wife\u2019s biggest booster, happily giving up his lucrative New York law practice to move with her to Washington in 1980, when President Jimmy Carter named her to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Thirteen years later, he lobbied vigorously behind the scenes for her appointment to the Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Settling in Washington, Mr. Ginsburg taught tax law at Georgetown University\u2019s law school. He occupied a chair that a longtime client, Ross Perot, had endowed for him in gratitude for years of tax advice that had saved the Texas entrepreneur untold millions of dollars. He was also a gourmet cook who did the family\u2019s cooking and, later, baked delicacies for his wife to share with colleagues at the court. (Ruth Ginsburg was, by her own description, a terrible cook whose children forbade her from entering the kitchen.) The Ginsburgs lived in a duplex apartment at the Watergate, next to the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, where they frequently attended the opera and ballet. Their 56-year marriage ended with his death from cancer in 2010 at the age of 78. In his final days, he left a note, handwritten on a yellow pad, for his wife to find by his bedside.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">\u201cMy dearest Ruth,\u201d it began. \u201cYou are the only person I have loved in my life, setting aside, a bit, parents and kids and their kids, and I have admired and loved you almost since the day we first met at Cornell.\u201d He added, \u201cWhat a treat it has been to watch you progress to the very top of the legal world!!\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"css-8h527k\">\n<div data-testid=\"lazyimage-container\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"css-1m50asq\" src=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-10S9\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-10S9-articleLarge-v5.jpg?quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;disable=upscale\" sizes=\"((min-width: 600px) and (max-width: 1004px)) 84vw, (min-width: 1005px) 80vw, 100vw\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-10S9\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-10S9-articleLarge-v5.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 600w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-10S9\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-10S9-jumbo-v5.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 1024w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-10S9\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-10S9-superJumbo-v5.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 2048w\" alt=\"Judge Ginsburg and her husband, Martin, at her Supreme Court confirmation hearings.\" \/><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-79elbk\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-wrapper\">\n<div class=\"css-1a48zt4 ehw59r15\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-children\">\n<figure class=\"css-1ef8w8q e1g7ppur0\"><figcaption class=\"css-18crmh6 ewdxa0s0\"><span class=\"css-16f3y1r e13ogyst0\">Judge Ginsburg and her husband, Martin, at her Supreme Court confirmation hearings.<\/span><span class=\"css-cnj6d5 e1z0qqy90\"><span class=\"css-1ly73wi e1tej78p0\">Credit&#8230;<\/span>Stephen Crowley<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Their two children, Jane, a professor of intellectual property law at Columbia Law School, and James, a producer of classical music recordings in Chicago, survive, along with four grandchildren.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Following their marriage, the couple settled in Lawton, Okla., where Mr. Ginsburg, having served in the R.O.T.C. during college, was due to spend two years as an Army officer at nearby Fort Sill. Ms. Ginsburg applied for a government job at the local Social Security office. She was offered a position as a claims examiner at the Civil Service rank of GS-5, but when she informed the personnel office that she was pregnant \u2014 with Jane, her first child \u2014 the offer was withdrawn. A pregnant woman could not travel for the necessary training, she was told. She accepted a clerk-typist job at the lowly rank of GS-2. As one of her biographers, Jane Sherron De Hart, wrote in \u201cRuth Bader Ginsburg: A Life\u201d (2018), the young wife, soon-to-be mother and future feminist icon \u201crationalized the incident as \u2018just the way things are.\u2019\u201d It would be years before Ruth Ginsburg made it her life\u2019s work to challenge the web of assumptions and the assignment of roles that limited women\u2019s opportunities.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Early in their marriage, with both enrolled at Harvard Law School (Mr. Ginsburg had completed his first year before entering the Army), the couple faced a daunting crisis. During his third year of law school, Mr. Ginsburg learned he had an aggressive testicular cancer, which was treated with radiation. The prognosis was poor, and he was rarely able to attend class. Other students took notes for him, and Ms. Ginsburg, while attending class herself and caring for their young daughter, typed up the notes and helped him study. He recovered and graduated on time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Harvard Law School was a challenge for women even in the best of times. There were no women on the faculty. During Ms. Ginsburg\u2019s first year, the dean, Erwin Griswold, invited the nine women in the class to dinner and interrogated each one, asking why she felt entitled to be in the class, taking the place of a man. Ruth stammered her answer: that because her husband was going to be a lawyer, she wanted to be able to understand his work.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">When her husband received a job offer in New York, Ms. Ginsburg asked Harvard officials if she could spend her final year at Columbia and still receive a Harvard degree. The request was denied, so she transferred and received a Columbia degree, tying for first place in the class. In 1972, she became the first woman to receive tenure on the Columbia law faculty.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">The experience evidently continued to rankle, and some years later, after Harvard announced that it was changing its policy and would now award a Harvard degree to students in similar predicaments, Mr. Ginsburg wrote the Harvard Law Record an ironic letter recalling that the incident had left his wife\u2019s \u201ccareer blighted at an early age.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">\u201cI asked Ruth if she planned to trade in her Columbia degree for a Harvard degree,\u201d Mr. Ginsburg wrote. \u201cShe just smiled.\u201d Harvard gave her an honorary degree in 2011 at a ceremony during which Pl\u00e1cido Domingo, another honorary degree recipient that year, addressed her in song. Justice Ginsburg, an opera devotee, called it one of the greatest experiences of her life.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<h2 id=\"link-629a3349\" class=\"css-1aoo5yy eoo0vm40\">The Swedish Influence<\/h2>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">After her graduation from Columbia, Ms. Ginsburg received no job offers from New York law firms. She spent two years clerking for a federal district judge, Edmund L. Palmieri, who agreed to hire her only after one of her mentors, Prof. Gerald Gunther, threatened never to send the judge another law clerk if he did not.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">After the clerkship, Ms. Ginsburg returned to Columbia to work on a comparative law project on civil procedure. The project required her to learn Swedish and to spend time in Sweden. The experience proved formative. Feminism was flourishing in Sweden, and there was nothing unusual about women combining work and family obligations. Child care was readily available. An article by the editor of a feminist magazine caught Ms. Ginsburg\u2019s attention. \u201cWe ought to stop harping on the concept of women\u2019s two roles,\u201d the editor, Eva Moberg, wrote. \u201cBoth men and women have <em class=\"css-2fg4z9 e1gzwzxm0\">one <\/em>principal role, that of being people.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Between 1963 and 1970, Ms. Ginsburg produced a treatise on Swedish civil law, which remains a leading work in the field, along with a dozen other articles and books. But more than this impressive academic output, the most important product of her Swedish interval may have been the effect on the young lawyer of directly observing a different way to organize society.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">After more prestigious law schools, including Columbia and New York University, would not hire her, she took a job teaching at Rutgers Law School, where she was the second woman on the faculty. In fact, fewer than two dozen women were teaching at all American law schools combined. Her second child, James, nine years younger than his sister, was born during this period.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">In addition to teaching, she began volunteering to handle discrimination cases for the New Jersey affiliate of the American Civil Liberties Union, which brought her such cases as complaints by public-school teachers who had lost their jobs when they became pregnant. A childhood friend from summer camp, Melvin Wulf, who had become national legal director for the A.C.L.U., heard about her work and brought more cases her way. Among them was the Idaho case on estate administrators that eventually became her first Supreme Court victory, Reed v. Reed. The 88-page brief she filed in that case, an inventory of all the ways in which law served to reinforce society\u2019s oppression of women, became famous in legal history as the \u201cgrandmother brief,\u201d on which feminist lawyers drew for many years.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">In 1972, the A.C.L.U. created a Women\u2019s Rights Project and hired Ms. Ginsburg as its first director. At the same time, she left Rutgers and began teaching at Columbia. It was under the A.C.L.U. project\u2019s auspices that she carried out her Supreme Court litigation strategy to persuade the justices that official discrimination on the basis of sex was a harm of constitutional dimension.<\/p>\n<div class=\"css-8h527k\">\n<div data-testid=\"lazyimage-container\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"css-1m50asq\" src=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2020\/09\/19\/obituaries\/19ginsburg-print-1\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-UTFT-articleLarge-v2.jpg?quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;disable=upscale\" sizes=\"((min-width: 600px) and (max-width: 1004px)) 84vw, (min-width: 1005px) 60vw, 100vw\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2020\/09\/19\/obituaries\/19ginsburg-print-1\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-UTFT-articleLarge-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 600w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2020\/09\/19\/obituaries\/19ginsburg-print-1\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-UTFT-jumbo-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 671w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2020\/09\/19\/obituaries\/19ginsburg-print-1\/ADV-OBIT-GINSBURG-SLIDE-S-slide-UTFT-superJumbo-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 1342w\" alt=\"Ms. Ginsburg was hired as the first director of the A.C.L.U.\u2019s Women\u2019s Rights Project in 1972.\" \/><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-79elbk\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-wrapper\">\n<div class=\"css-1a48zt4 ehw59r15\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-children\">\n<figure class=\"css-ujjex e1g7ppur0\"><figcaption class=\"css-1l44abu ewdxa0s0\"><span class=\"css-16f3y1r e13ogyst0\">Ms. Ginsburg was hired as the first director of the A.C.L.U.\u2019s Women\u2019s Rights Project in 1972.<\/span><span class=\"css-cnj6d5 e1z0qqy90\"><span class=\"css-1ly73wi e1tej78p0\">Credit&#8230;<\/span>Librado Romero\/The New York Times<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">The implications of this strategy were not immediately apparent, even to those who watched closely as it unfolded. Clearly, Ms. Ginsburg was doing something different in selecting cases in which the victims of disparate government treatment were men. On one level, it was obvious that she was trying to feed the justices a diet of cases they could easily digest: Why should men be treated less generously than women simply because they were men? What the government owed to one sex, it owed to the other, full stop.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">But for Ms. Ginsburg, something deeper and more radical was at stake. Her project was to free both sexes, men as well as women, from the roles that society had assigned them and to harness the Constitution to break down the structures by which the state maintained and enforced those separate spheres. That was why a widowed father seeking social welfare to enable him to be his baby\u2019s caregiver was the perfect plaintiff: not only because his claim to the benefits that would go automatically to a widow might strike sympathetic justices as reasonable, but because his very goal could open the court\u2019s eyes to the fact that child care was not a sex-determined role to be performed only by women.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Wendy W. Williams, an emeritus professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center and Justice Ginsburg\u2019s authorized biographer, wrote in a 2013 article that Ms. Ginsburg\u2019s litigation campaign succeeded in \u201ctargeting, laser-like, the complex and pervasive legal framework that treated women as yin and men as yang, and either rewarded them for their compliance with sex-appropriate role behavior or penalized them for deviation from it.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Professor Williams continued: \u201cShe saw that male and female were viewed in law and beyond as a natural duality \u2014 polar opposites interconnected and interdependent by nature or divine design \u2014 and she understood that you couldn\u2019t untie one half of that knot.\u201d Male plaintiffs were thus essential to the project of dismantling what Justice Ginsburg referred to as \u201csex-role pigeonholing.\u201d Sex discrimination hurt both men and women, and both stood to be liberated by Ruth Ginsburg\u2019s vision of sex equality.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Prof. Neil S. Siegel of Duke Law School described that vision as one of \u201cequal citizenship stature.\u201d A former Ginsburg law clerk, he described in a 2009 article a moment when \u201can adoring female visitor to chambers once remarked to Justice Ginsburg that her \u2018feminist\u2019 girlfriends just loved the justice for what she had done for American women.\u201d According to Professor Siegel, \u201cthe justice replied to the effect that she hoped the visitor\u2019s male friends loved her as well.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"link-41093ded\" class=\"css-1aoo5yy eoo0vm40\">\u2018A Force for Consensus-Building\u2019<\/h2>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Many who had followed Ms. Ginsburg\u2019s litigating career expressed surprise as she began compiling a moderate rather than liberal voting record on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, which she joined in 1980. She sometimes appeared more comfortable with the court\u2019s conservative members, who included such judges as Antonin Scalia and Robert H. Bork, than with liberal colleagues including <a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2019\/01\/12\/obituaries\/patricia-wald-dead.html\">Judge Patricia M. Wald<\/a>, another appointee of Mr. Carter\u2019s who was the first woman to serve on that important court.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">In fact, Judge Ginsburg\u2019s anomalous role as what might be called a judicial-restraint liberal sprang from deep convictions that in a healthy democracy, the judicial branch should work in partnership with the other branches, rather than seek to impose a last word that left no room for further discussion.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">This was the basis for her criticism of Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court\u2019s 1973 decision establishing a constitutional right to abortion. In a speech at New York University Law School in 1993, several months before her nomination to the Supreme Court, she criticized the ruling as having \u201chalted a political process that was moving in a reform direction and thereby, I believe, prolonged divisiveness and deferred stable settlement of the issue.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">While leaving no doubt about her own support for abortion rights, she said the court would have done better to issue a narrow rather than sweeping ruling, one that left states with some ability to regulate abortions without prohibiting them. \u201cThe framers of the Constitution allowed to rest in the court\u2019s hands large authority to rule on the Constitution\u2019s meaning\u201d but \u201carmed the court with no swords to carry out its pronouncements,\u201d she said, adding that the court had to be wary of \u201ctaking giant strides and thereby risking a backlash too forceful to contain.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">In contrast to Judge Ginsburg\u2019s underlying assumption, there was in fact ample evidence that what had once appeared a steady legislative march toward revision or repeal of the old criminal abortion laws had stalled by 1973 in the face of powerful lobbying by the Roman Catholic Church. And there was also evidence that the backlash against the decision was not a spontaneous response \u2014 in fact, polling in the decision\u2019s immediate aftermath demonstrated widespread and growing public approval \u2014 but rather was elicited by Republican strategists hunting for Catholic voters, who had traditionally been Democrats. In later years, Justice Ginsburg acknowledged questions about the historical accuracy of her narrative, but she maintained her criticism of the decision.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">The New York University speech alarmed the leaders of some women\u2019s groups and abortion rights organizations, some of whom lobbied quietly against her when Justice White announced in March 1993 that he would soon be leaving the court. Mr. Clinton, making his first nomination to the court, conducted an almost painfully public search among judges and political figures, with contenders including Mario Cuomo, then the governor of New York, who turned him down, and Bruce Babbitt, the incumbent secretary of the interior.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">As the search wound down, it appeared the president had chosen Stephen G. Breyer, chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Boston, who had come to Washington at the president\u2019s invitation for an interview. Judge Breyer was in pain from broken ribs suffered in a recent bicycle accident, and the interview did not go well. Martin Ginsburg, meanwhile, had been urging New York\u2019s senior senator, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, to press his wife\u2019s case with the president. Mr. Clinton was at first reluctant, grumbling to Mr. Moynihan that \u201cthe women are against her.\u201d But after a 90-minute private meeting with Judge Ginsburg on Sunday, June 13, the president made up his mind. <a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1993\/06\/15\/us\/supreme-court-overview-clinton-names-ruth-ginsburg-advocate-for-women-court.html\">He called her<\/a> at 11:33 that night to tell her that she was his choice.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">\u201cI believe that in the years ahead she will be able to be a force for consensus-building on the Supreme Court, just as she has been on the Court of Appeals,\u201d Mr. Clinton said at the announcement ceremony the next day. The appointment proved highly popular with the public, and she was confirmed on Aug. 3, 1993, over the dissenting votes of three of the Senate\u2019s most conservative Republicans: Jesse Helms of North Carolina, Don Nickles of Oklahoma and Robert C. Smith of New Hampshire.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Addressing the Senate Judiciary Committee, Judge Ginsburg said her approach to judging was \u201cneither \u2018liberal\u2019 nor \u2018conservative.\u2019\u201d She did, however, make clear that her support for the right to abortion, despite her criticism of Roe v. Wade, was unequivocal. <a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1993\/07\/22\/us\/the-supreme-court-excerpts-from-senate-hearing-on-the-ginsburg-nomination.html\">In answer to a question<\/a> from Senator Hank Brown, a Colorado Republican, she said: \u201cThis is something central to a woman\u2019s life, to her dignity. It\u2019s a decision that she must make for herself. And when government controls that decision for her, she\u2019s being treated as less than a fully adult human responsible for her own choices.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Fourteen years later, on a Supreme Court that had turned notably more conservative with the departures of Justices Marshall and O\u2019Connor and their replacement by Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr., Justice Ginsburg expressed herself on the subject of abortion in one of her most stinging and widely noticed dissenting opinions. In Gonzales v. Carhart, the court by a 5-to-4 vote <a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2007\/04\/19\/washington\/19scotus.html\">upheld a federal law<\/a> criminalizing a particular procedure that doctors used infrequently to terminate pregnancies during the second trimester. In his majority opinion, Justice Kennedy said the law was justified in part to protect women from the regret they might feel after undergoing the procedure. That rationale, Justice Ginsburg objected in dissent, relied on \u201can anti-abortion shibboleth\u201d \u2014 the notion that women regret their abortions \u2014 for which the court \u201cconcededly has no reliable evidence.\u201d The majority\u2019s \u201cway of thinking,\u201d she wrote, \u201creflects ancient notions about women\u2019s place in the family and under the Constitution \u2014 ideas that have long since been discredited.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">It was during that 2006-7 Supreme Court term that Justice Ginsburg\u2019s powerful dissenting voice emerged. Another decision that term provoked another strong dissent. The court voted 5 to 4 in the case of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company to reject a woman\u2019s pay discrimination claim on the grounds that the woman, Lilly Ledbetter, had not filed her complaint within the statutory 180-day deadline. Justice Alito\u2019s majority opinion held that the 180-day clock had started running with Ms. Ledbetter\u2019s first paycheck reflecting the management\u2019s decision to pay her less than it paid the men doing the same job.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Justice Ginsburg objected that, properly interpreted, the 180-period began only when an employee actually learned about the discrimination. Congress should make this clear, she wrote, declaring: \u201cThe ball is in Congress\u2019s court.\u201d The impact of her unusually direct call to Congress was magnified because she took the unusual step of announcing her dissent from the bench. What might have been seen as a technical dispute over a statute of limitations became a very public call to arms.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">It worked. Congress voted to overturn what Justice Ginsburg called the court\u2019s \u201cparsimonious reading\u201d of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. On Jan. 29, 2009, the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act was the first bill that Mr. Obama <a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/01\/30\/us\/politics\/30ledbetter-web.html\">signed into law<\/a>. \u201cJustice Ginsburg was <em class=\"css-2fg4z9 e1gzwzxm0\">courting <\/em>the people,\u201d Prof. Lani Guinier of Harvard Law School wrote in a 2013 essay. Professor Guinier called the oral dissent \u201ca democratizing form of judicial speech\u201d that \u201ccould be easily understood by those outside the courtroom.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"link-2a19f369\" class=\"css-1aoo5yy eoo0vm40\">Donning the \u2018Dissenting Collar\u2019<\/h2>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Justice Ginsburg took care with her opinions, those for the majority as well as those in dissent. Her opinions were tightly composed, with straightforward declarative sentences and a minimum of jargon. She sometimes said she was inspired to pay attention to writing by studying literature under Vladimir Nabokov at Cornell.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Still, it was her dissents, particularly those she announced from the bench, that received the most attention. Playing along with her crowd, she took to switching the decorative collars she wore with her judicial robe on days when she would be announcing a dissent. She even wore her \u201cdissenting collar,\u201d which one observer described as \u201cresembling a piece of medieval armor,\u201d the day after Mr. Trump\u2019s election.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">One of her best-known dissents came in 2013 in Shelby County v. Holder, in which the 5-to-4 majority <a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2013\/06\/26\/us\/supreme-court-ruling.html\">eviscerated the Voting Rights Act<\/a> of 1965 by invalidating the provision that required Southern jurisdictions, along with some others, to receive federal permission \u2014 \u201cpreclearance\u201d \u2014 before making a change in voting procedures.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">\u201cWhat has become of the court\u2019s usual restraint?\u201d Justice Ginsburg demanded in an ironic reference to conservative calls for \u201cjudicial restraint.\u201d And she ended her announcement with these words: \u201cThe great man who led the march from Selma to Montgomery and there called for the passage of the Voting Rights Act foresaw progress, even in Alabama. \u2018The arc of the moral universe is long,\u2019 he said, but \u2018it bends toward justice,\u2019 if there is a steadfast commitment to see the task through to completion. That commitment has been disserved by today\u2019s decision.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"css-8h527k\">\n<div data-testid=\"lazyimage-container\"><picture class=\"css-1j5kxti\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"css-1m50asq\" src=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2020\/07\/21\/obituaries\/00Ginburg-groupsub\/00Ginburg-groupsub-articleLarge-v2.jpg?quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;disable=upscale\" sizes=\"((min-width: 600px) and (max-width: 1004px)) 84vw, (min-width: 1005px) 60vw, 100vw\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2020\/07\/21\/obituaries\/00Ginburg-groupsub\/00Ginburg-groupsub-articleLarge-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 600w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2020\/07\/21\/obituaries\/00Ginburg-groupsub\/00Ginburg-groupsub-jumbo-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 1024w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2020\/07\/21\/obituaries\/00Ginburg-groupsub\/00Ginburg-groupsub-superJumbo-v2.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 2048w\" alt=\"A 2018 portrait of U.S. Supreme Court justices. In later years Justice Ginsburg drew comments for years on her fragile appearance, but she shrugged off calls for her to retire.\" \/><\/picture><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-79elbk\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-wrapper\">\n<div class=\"css-1a48zt4 ehw59r15\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-children\">\n<figure class=\"css-jcw7oy e1g7ppur0\"><figcaption class=\"css-1l44abu ewdxa0s0\"><span class=\"css-16f3y1r e13ogyst0\">A 2018 portrait of U.S. Supreme Court justices. In later years Justice Ginsburg drew comments for years on her fragile appearance, but she shrugged off calls for her to retire.<\/span><span class=\"css-cnj6d5 e1z0qqy90\"><span class=\"css-1ly73wi e1tej78p0\">Credit&#8230;<\/span>J. Scott Applewhite\/Associated Press<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Among Justice Ginsburg\u2019s roughly 200 majority opinions \u2014 seven or eight per term \u2014 one of her favorites came in a relatively obscure decision in 1996 called <a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/1996\/12\/17\/us\/needy-who-lose-parental-rights-gain-in-top-court.html\">M.L.B. v. S.L.J<\/a>. The question was whether a parent whose parental rights had been terminated by a court decree had a right to appeal even if unable to pay the cost of having the official court record prepared. The Supreme Court of Mississippi had ruled that the state had no obligation to pay for the required record, without which the appeal could not proceed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Constitutional doctrine offered no clear path to ruling for the mother, M.L.B. With few exceptions, most notably the right to a lawyer for an indigent criminal defendant, the Constitution does not grant affirmative rights, and Supreme Court precedent rejects the notion that poverty is a condition deserving of special judicial consideration as a matter of equal protection. So Justice Ginsburg anchored her 6-to-3 decision in a separate line of cases in which the court had treated protection for family relationships as fundamental.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">\u201cThe state may not bolt the door to equal justice\u201d when it came to parental rights, she wrote in an opinion that delicately threaded the needle between unfavorable Supreme Court precedents and those from which favorable legal authority could be extrapolated. \u201cIn this context,\u201d Prof. Martha Minow, a dean of Harvard Law School, wrote in an admiring essay on the opinion, \u201cJustice Ginsburg\u2019s opinion for the court in M.L.B. v. S.L.J. is truly extraordinary.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">A decision in 2017 addressed the differential treatment imposed by federal immigration law on unwed mothers and unwed fathers who seek to transmit their American citizenship to their children born overseas. Under the law, the mother could transmit her American citizenship as long as she had lived in the United States for at least one year. For fathers, the requirement was five years. The assumption built into the law was that while the mother\u2019s identity was obvious, it was less so for fathers, who were less likely to assume the responsibility of parenthood on behalf of their out-of-wedlock offspring.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Writing for a 6-to-2 majority in <a class=\"css-1g7m0tk\" title=\"\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2017\/06\/12\/us\/politics\/supreme-court-citizenship-ginsburg-gorsuch.html\">Sessions v. Morales-Santana<\/a>, Justice Ginsburg found the law to violate the constitutional guarantee of equal protection. The sex-based distinction, she wrote, was \u201cstunningly anachronistic,\u201d reflecting \u201can era when the law books of our nation were rife with overbroad generalizations about the way men and women are.\u201d Invoking language she had used for many decades, first as an advocate and now as a justice, she continued, \u201cOverbroad generalizations of that order, the court has come to comprehend, have a constraining impact, descriptive though they may be of the way many people still order their lives.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2 class=\"css-1aoo5yy eoo0vm40\">No Fear on the Bench<\/h2>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-n27z15\">\n<div class=\"css-mm3pwi\">\n<div class=\"css-1g7y0i5 e1drnplw0\">\n<div class=\"css-f2fzwx e1drnplw2\">\n<section class=\"meteredContent css-1r7ky0e\">\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Asked often to explain the success of her 1970s litigation campaign, Justice Ginsburg usually offered some version of having been in the right place with the right arguments at the right time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">\u201cHow fortunate I was to be alive and a lawyer,\u201d she wrote in the preface to \u201cMy Own Words,\u201d a compilation of her writing published in 2016, \u201cwhen, for the first time in U.S. history, it became possible to urge, successfully, before legislatures and courts, the equal-citizenship stature of women and men as a fundamental constitutional principle.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Still, she could not fully deny that she had played more than a walk-on role. \u201cWhat caused the court\u2019s understanding to dawn and grow?\u201d she asked in an article published in the Hofstra Law Review in 1997. \u201cJudges do read the newspapers and are affected, not by the weather of the day, as distinguished constitutional law professor Paul Freund once said, but by the climate of the era.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">\u201cSupreme Court justices, and lower court judges as well, were becoming aware of a sea change in United States society. Their enlightenment was advanced publicly by the briefs filed in court and privately, I suspect, by the aspirations of the women, particularly the daughters and granddaughters, in their own families and communities.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Justice Ginsburg was as precise in her appearance as in her approach to her work. She wore her dark hair pulled back and favored finely tailored suits by the designer Giorgio Armani, interspersed occasionally with flamboyantly patterned jackets acquired on distant travels. She appeared on several lists of best-dressed women.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"css-1m50asq\" src=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/GINSBURG-RUTH-ADV-OBIT-slide-4733\/GINSBURG-RUTH-ADV-OBIT-slide-4733-articleLarge.jpg?quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;disable=upscale\" sizes=\"((min-width: 600px) and (max-width: 1004px)) 84vw, (min-width: 1005px) 80vw, 100vw\" srcset=\"https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/GINSBURG-RUTH-ADV-OBIT-slide-4733\/GINSBURG-RUTH-ADV-OBIT-slide-4733-articleLarge.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 600w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/GINSBURG-RUTH-ADV-OBIT-slide-4733\/GINSBURG-RUTH-ADV-OBIT-slide-4733-jumbo.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 1024w, https:\/\/static01.nyt.com\/images\/2014\/11\/01\/obituaries\/GINSBURG-RUTH-ADV-OBIT-slide-4733\/GINSBURG-RUTH-ADV-OBIT-slide-4733-superJumbo.jpg?quality=90&amp;auto=webp 2048w\" alt=\"Justice Ginsburg had battled health issues for years, vowing to stay on the court &amp;ldquo;as long as I can do the job full steam.&amp;rdquo;\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-79elbk\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-wrapper\">\n<div class=\"css-1a48zt4 ehw59r15\" data-testid=\"photoviewer-children\">\n<figure class=\"css-1ef8w8q e1g7ppur0\">\n<div class=\"css-1xdhyk6 erfvjey0\"><\/div><figcaption class=\"css-18crmh6 ewdxa0s0\"><span class=\"css-16f3y1r e13ogyst0\">Justice Ginsburg had battled health issues for years, vowing to stay on the court \u201cas long as I can do the job full steam.\u201d<\/span><span class=\"css-cnj6d5 e1z0qqy90\"><span class=\"css-1ly73wi e1tej78p0\">Credit&#8230;<\/span>Hilary Swift for The New York Times<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">Although on the bench she was an active and persistent questioner, in social settings she tended to say little. She often let her more outgoing and jovial husband speak for her, and she struck those who did not know her well as shy and even withdrawn \u2014 although in talking about her great love, opera, she could become almost lyrical. Still, there was so little wasted motion that it was nearly impossible to imagine her as the high school cheerleader and twirler she had once been.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">It was not so much that there were two sides to her personality, as it might have appeared, as that her innate shyness simply disappeared when she had a job to do. She once recalled that before her first Supreme Court argument, she was so nervous that she did not eat lunch \u201cfor fear I might throw up.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1fanzo5 StoryBodyCompanionColumn\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-158dogj evys1bk0\">But about two minutes into the argument, \u201cthe fear dissolved,\u201d she said. She realized that she had a \u201ccaptive audience\u201d of the most powerful judges in America, and \u201cI felt a surge of power that carried me through.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-pncxxs etfikam0\"><em>Adam Liptak contributed reporting.<\/em><\/p>\n<p class=\"css-pncxxs etfikam0\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/09\/18\/us\/ruth-bader-ginsburg-dead.html?action=click&amp;module=Spotlight&amp;pgtype=Homepage\">The New York Times<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Linda Greenhouse, headline story, September 19, 2020 The second woman appointed to the Supreme Court, Justice Ginsburg\u2019s pointed and powerful dissenting opinions earned her late-life rock stardom. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the second woman to serve on the Supreme Court and a pioneering advocate for women\u2019s rights, who in her ninth decade became a much [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1001004,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[53],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10751"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1001004"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=10751"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10751\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10752,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10751\/revisions\/10752"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=10751"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=10751"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=10751"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}