By Devlin Barret, Adam Entous and Philip Rucker, National Security, May 9, 2017<\/p>\n
President Trump fired FBI Director James B. Comey on Tuesday, at the recommendation of senior Justice Department officials who said he had treated Hillary Clinton unfairly and in doing so damaged the credibility of the FBI and the Justice Department.<\/p>\n
The startling development comes as Comey was leading a counterintelligence investigation to determine whether associates of Trump may have coordinated with Russia to interfere with the U.S. presidential election last year. It wasn\u2019t immediately clear how Comey\u2019s ouster will affect the Russia probe, but Democrats said they were concerned that his ouster could derail the investigation.<\/p>\n
[How members of Congress reacted after Comey\u2019s dismissal<\/a>]<\/i><\/p>\n Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that Comey\u2019s deputy, Andrew McCabe, would be the acting director of the FBI. As a presidential candidate, Trump explicitly criticized Comey and McCabe for their roles in the Clinton probe while at other points praising Comey for his \u201cguts.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThe president has accepted the recommendation of the attorney general and the deputy attorney general regarding the dismissal of the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,\u201d press secretary Sean Spicer told reporters in the White House briefing room. The firing is effective \u201cimmediately,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n Comey was in Los Angeles on Tuesday on a recruiting trip.<\/p>\n Officials said Comey was fired because senior Justice Department officials concluded that he had violated Justice Department principles and procedures last year by publicly discussing the investigation of Hillary Clinton\u2019s use of a private email server. Democrats have long argued that Comey\u2019s decisions in the months and days before the election hurt Clinton\u2019s standing with voters and affected the outcome, but the president and his closest advisers had argued that Comey went too easy on Clinton and her aides.<\/p>\n Just last week, Trump publicly accused Comey of giving Clinton \u201ca free pass for many bad deeds\u2019\u2019 when he decided not to recommend criminal charges in the case.<\/p>\n Officials released a Tuesday memo from the deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, laying out the rationale behind Comey\u2019s dismissal and attributing it all to his handling of the Clinton case. Officials said Rosenstein began examining Comey\u2019s conduct shortly after being sworn into office two weeks ago.<\/p>\n [The Justice Department\u2019s case against James B. Comey, annotated<\/a>]<\/i><\/p>\n \u201cThe FBI\u2019s reputation and credibility have suffered substantial damage, and it has affected the entire Department of Justice,\u201d Rosenstein wrote. \u201cI cannot defend the director\u2019s handling of the conclusion of the investigation of Secretary Clinton\u2019s emails, and I do not understand his refusal to accept the nearly universal judgment that he was mistaken. Almost everyone agrees that the director made serious mistakes; it is one of the few issues that unites people of diverse perspectives.<\/p>\n Democrats skeptical<\/p>\n But Democrats immediately linked the dismissal to the Russia probe.<\/p>\n \u201cThe decision by a President whose campaign associates are under investigation by the FBI for collusion with Russia to fire the man overseeing that investigation, upon the recommendation of an Attorney General who has recused himself from that investigation, raises profound questions about whether the White House is brazenly interfering in a criminal matter,\u201d Rep. Adam B. Schiff (Calif.), the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said in a statement. The House committee is looking into Russian interference in the election.<\/p>\n Some Republicans were also concerned. \u201cI am troubled by the timing and reasoning of Director Comey\u2019s termination,\u201d said Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.), head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is also examining Russian meddling. \u201cI have found Director Comey to be a public servant of the highest order, and his dismissal further confuses an already difficult investigation by the Committee.\u201d<\/p>\n There were multiple calls by Democrats on Tuesday night for the appointment of a special prosecutor to lead the Russia investigation and take the matter out of the hands of Justice Department leadership.<\/p>\n In an attempt to pressure Republicans to join calls for an independent prosecutor, Senate Democrats have been asked by Minority Leader Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) to be in the Senate chamber at 9:30 a.m. Wednesday when the legislative day begins.<\/p>\n In a late-night tweet Tuesday, Trump targeted Schumer. \u201cCryin\u2019 Chuck Schumer stated recently, \u201cI do not have confidence in him (James Comey) any longer.\u201d Then acts so indignant. #draintheswamp,\u201d the president wrote.<\/p>\n Trump plans to meet with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Wednesday. It will be the first face-to-face contact between the president and a senior official of the Russian government.<\/p>\n [James Comey timeline: Everything that led up to his firing<\/a>]<\/i><\/p>\n Rosenstein wrote in the memo that when Comey announced on July 5 that he had decided not to recommend charges in the Clinton case, he did so \u201cwithout the authorization of duly appointed Justice Department leaders. Compounding the error, the director ignored another longstanding principle: we do not hold press conferences to release derogatory information about the subject of a declined criminal investigation .\u2009.\u2009. we never release it gratuitously .\u2009.\u2009. It is a textbook example of what federal prosecutors and agents are taught not to do.\u201d<\/p>\n Rosenstein was also critical of Comey\u2019s decision to reveal in late October that the Clinton email probe had resumed, and he dismissed the FBI director\u2019s recent defense to Congress that not doing so would have effectively been to \u201cconceal\u201d important information.<\/p>\n \u201c\u2008\u2018Conceal\u2019 is a loaded term that misstates the issue,\u201d Rosenstein wrote. \u201cWhen federal agents and prosecutors quietly open a criminal investigation, we are not concealing anything; we are simply following the longstanding policy that we refrain from publicizing non-public information. In that context, silence is not concealment.\u201d<\/p>\n In a letter to Trump, Sessions said that he agreed Comey had to go.<\/p>\n \u201cI have concluded that a fresh start is needed at the leadership of the FBI,\u2019\u2019 Sessions wrote. \u201cI must recommend that you remove Director James B. Comey, Jr. and identify an experienced and qualified individual to lead the great men and women of the FBI.\u2019\u2019<\/p>\n But in October \u2014 when Sessions was a senator supporting Trump, and Comey revealed less than two weeks before the election that he had reopened the investigation into Clinton\u2019s use of a private email server \u2014 Sessions applauded the decision in an appearance on Fox Business Network.<\/p>\n \u201cHe had an absolute duty, in my opinion, 11 days or not, to come forward with the new information that he has and let the American people know that, too,\u201d Sessions said at the time.<\/p>\n Nothing in the Rosenstein memo suggests that the Clinton investigation will be reopened.<\/p>\n Tuesday afternoon, White House aide Keith Schiller, who has long served Trump as a bodyguard, visited FBI headquarters to hand-deliver Trump\u2019s dismissal letter to Comey\u2019s office, although the director wasn\u2019t there to receive it, officials said.<\/p>\n Trump wrote to Comey: \u201cYou are hereby terminated and removed from office, effective immediately.\u2019\u2019<\/p>\n [Read the letters from the White House and the attorney general<\/a>]<\/i><\/p>\n The president added: \u201cWhile I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation, I nevertheless concur with the judgment of the Department of Justice that you are not able to effectively lead the Bureau.\u2019\u2019<\/p>\n Speaking to reporters Tuesday evening, Spicer said he did not know what the three occasions were when Comey told Trump that he wasn\u2019t under investigation. Spicer also rejected calls for a special prosecutor. \u201cSpecial prosecutor, for what? On multiple occasions, they said that the president wasn\u2019t under investigation. What are we investigating?\u201d he said.<\/p>\n The news of Comey\u2019s firing stunned Washington.<\/p>\n Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said Comey\u2019s decisions \u201chave called into question the trust and political independence of the FBI.\u2019\u2019<\/p>\n The senior Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, Rep. John Conyers Jr. (Mich.), however, compared Tuesday\u2019s developments to the Watergate scandal and said the actions \u201creek of a coverup and appear to be part of an ongoing effort by the Trump White House to impede the investigation into Russian ties and interference in our elections.\u2019\u2019<\/p>\n Over the past two years, Comey had assumed an extraordinary role in Washington \u2014 overseeing not one, but two investigations involving presidential candidates. In some ways, that made him more powerful than the Justice Department officials to whom he reported.<\/p>\n After Clinton lost to Trump, many Democrats blamed Comey for what they viewed as his unprecedented interference in the election process, but most later came to see him as an independent figure in the Trump administration who would be critical to a fair and thorough investigation of any possible ties between Russia and Trump associates.<\/p>\n Strains over leak cases<\/p>\n Several current and former officials said the relationship between the White House and the FBI had been strained for months, in part because administration officials were pressuring Comey to more aggressively pursue leak investigations over disclosures that embarrassed the White House and raised questions about ties with Russia.<\/p>\n That pressure was described as conversational challenges to FBI leadership to pursue the source of leaks seen as damaging to the administration, the officials said, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. Although the FBI is investigating disclosures of classified information, the bureau has resisted calls to prioritize leak investigations over the Russia matter, or probe matters that did not involve leaks of classified or otherwise sensitive information, the officials said.<\/p>\n