{"id":16162,"date":"2025-03-07T11:36:38","date_gmt":"2025-03-07T19:36:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/?p=16162"},"modified":"2025-03-09T11:46:05","modified_gmt":"2025-03-09T18:46:05","slug":"trump-is-offering-putin-another-munich-the-atlantic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/?p=16162","title":{"rendered":"“Trump Is Offering Putin Another Munich”, The Atlantic"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

lHitler didn\u2019t want a peace deal, and neither does Putin. By\u00a0Robert Kagan<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

MARCH 7, 2025<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hitler regretted the deal he made with Neville Chamberlain at Munich in 1938. What he actually wanted was war\u2014his goal was to conquer all of Czechoslovakia by force as a first step toward the conquest of all of Europe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"A
Photo Illustration by The Atlantic. Source: Getty<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

He didn\u2019t imagine that the British and French governments would be so craven as to give him everything he publicly asked for, including the dismemberment of Czechoslovakia and the occupation of the Sudetenland by the German army. When they did, Hitler found himself trapped into accepting, but he was unhappy. Within five months he ordered the military occupation of all Czechoslovakia, in violation of the Munich Agreement, and six months after that, he invaded Poland.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Today the Trump administration is offering Vladimir Putin a Munich-like settlement for Ukraine. Trump\u2019s negotiators have offered Putin almost everything he has publicly asked for without demanding anything in return. They may assume that if they give him everything up front, he will agree to a cease-fire and some kind of deal that will save face for President Donald Trump, allowing him to claim the mantle of peacemaker, just as Chamberlain did, albeit for only a few months.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Will Putin accept? At the moment, thanks to Trump\u2019s anti-Ukraine maneuvers, he has the luxury of watching Washington and Kyiv wrangle over terms while he pummels Ukraine\u2019s population and energy grid and brings the country closer to collapse. But so far, Putin has been clear about the terms he is willing to accept to achieve peace. Like Michael Corleone in The Godfather Part II<\/em>, his offer is this: nothing.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

No security guarantee; no independent, sovereign Ukraine; perhaps not even a cease-fire. Putin\u2019s goal, as it has been from the beginning, is the incorporation of Ukraine into Russia and the complete erasure of the Ukrainian nation, language, and culture. He will gladly accept Ukraine\u2019s surrender whenever Kyiv is ready to concede, but short of that he is going to keep the war going until he takes everything.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Let\u2019s start with security guarantees. Putin has never agreed to them for Ukraine\u2014in any form<\/em>. Putin and his spokesmen have stated repeatedly that Moscow will never accept European troops on Ukrainian soil as part of a peace deal. To accept European troops in Ukraine is no different in Putin\u2019s mind than to accept NATO\u2014as Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said as recently as last week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Nor is Putin\u2019s refusal hard to understand. Any deal that put Western troops on Ukrainian soil would leave Russia in an objectively worse strategic situation than before the invasion. After three years of conflict, as many as 1 million casualties, and widespread economic suffering, Putin would have succeeded only in tightening the circle of containment around Russia, including the admission to NATO of Sweden and Finland; bringing hostile forces closer to Russia\u2019s border; and substantially increasing even peacetime defense requirements. His broader ambitions in Europe would be blocked, perhaps forever. If Trump could see past the aura of his own dealmaking genius, he would see that for Putin to end the war with European troops on Ukrainian soil for any purpose would be a colossal strategic failure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Putin has also rejected the idea of an international guarantee of Ukraine\u2019s security even without troops on the ground. Early negotiations in 2022 broke down precisely over that point. Ukraine wanted an international commitment to come to Ukraine\u2019s aid in the event that Russia launched another attack\u2014something equivalent to the Article 5 guarantee in the NATO treaty. This would not have meant foreign troops on Ukrainian soil\u2014or even any official relationship between Ukraine and NATO\u2014but rather a commitment by signatory states to come to a \u201cneutral\u201d Ukraine\u2019s aid if it was invaded. Putin rejected this, insisting on a Russian veto over any such action.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Putin has even insisted that Ukraine should not be permitted to maintain a military capable of resisting another Russian invasion. He has demanded strict limits on the number of Ukrainian forces and rejected any notion of allowing the U.S. or Europe to continue providing weapons to help Ukraine defend itself against future attack. In short, Putin\u2019s unwavering demand in any peace settlement has been to leave Ukraine essentially defenseless.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Further, Putin has from the beginning demanded an end to the government of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky as a prior condition before any agreement. That he ever expected this demand to be met is doubtful: What nation agrees to the toppling of its government as the price for peace, except as terms of surrender? Yet he\u2019s sticking to this demand. According to reports, Trump officials are right now working to force Zelensky from power and replace him with someone presumably friendlier to Moscow. Judging by the reaction of most Ukrainians to the ambush of their president in the Oval Office, this effort will not succeed. But the fact that Trump officials are trying shows that Putin has not budged an inch in response to Trump\u2019s many concessions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

He has also not budged from his broader demand for \u201cde-Nazification,\u201d by which he means the suppression of Ukrainian as the official language of Ukraine, to be replaced by Russian, and of Ukrainian culture and nationalism, which Putin sees as tantamount to resistance to Moscow\u2019s domination. If anyone wants to know what Putin hopes to do with Ukraine once he has control, they have only to look at what he is already doing in the territories Russia occupies, where Ukrainians are being forced to become Russian citizens, and any resistance leads to imprisonment, torture, and execution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Everyone in the West seems to agree that there will be a cease-fire in Ukraine at some point. But one person who never talks about a cease-fire is Vladimir Putin. He does not talk about a cease-fire with his own people. He has at no time offered a cease-fire to the Ukrainians or the Americans. People assume he wants a cease-fire because his losses are staggering and his economy is suffering. But, as I and others have argued, Putin has to believe only that Ukraine is closer to collapse than he is, and that though he is suffering, the Ukrainians are suffering more. Trump\u2019s latest moves to paralyze Ukraine\u2019s defenses against missile and drone attacks by denying vital U.S. intelligence sharing can only bolster that assessment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Putin might be tempted to strike a Munich-like deal with Trump just to strengthen an American president who seems determined to give Putin what he may never have imagined possible\u2014a complete American capitulation in the global struggle, the destruction of the NATO alliance, the isolation of a weak Europe, and an open field for further actions to fulfill Putin\u2019s overarching goal, which is the reconstitution of the Soviet Union and its empire in Eastern and Central Europe. This is where the Munich analogy breaks down, because whatever else Chamberlain\u2019s appeasement was, it did not include changing sides in the ongoing European crisis and joining Hitler to carve up the continent.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Yet Putin may calculate that he is getting that for free already. The damage Trump has done to NATO is probably irreparable. The alliance relied on an American guarantee that is no longer reliable, to say the least. But Trump is mercurial and could reverse course, at least partially, at any time. That\u2019s a reason for Putin to seek victory as quickly as possible. He may never have a chance as good as this one to complete the task he set out to achieve when he launched his invasion three years ago.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One thing is certain: Trump is no poker player. Thanks to his actions so far, Putin hasn\u2019t had to reveal any of his cards. Trump claims to know what Putin wants, but his own actions show that he actually has no clue. One day Trump says Russia wants peace for reasons \u201conly I know.\u201d The next, he warns Putin that he\u2019ll impose more sanctions. Putin must be laughing up his sleeve. He\u2019s weathered American sanctions for the better part of three years now; more of the same is not much of a threat. If that\u2019s the only card Trump intends to play, Putin will soon be cashing in, and Ukraine will soon be doomed. Neville Chamberlain believed that Hitler wouldn\u2019t violate the Munich deal because Hitler respected him. Trump shares that delusion about Putin. We may all pay the price.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

ABOUT THE AUTHOR<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Robert Kagan<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Robert Kagan<\/a> is a contributing writer for The Atlantic, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, and the author, most recently, of Rebellion: How Antiliberalism Is Tearing America Apart\u2014Again<\/em>.<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Explore More Topics<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Adolf Hitler<\/a>, Donald Trump<\/a>, Europe<\/a>, NATO<\/a>, Russia<\/a>, Ukraine<\/a>, Vladimir Putin<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

lHitler didn\u2019t want a peace deal, and neither does Putin. By\u00a0Robert Kagan MARCH 7, 2025 Hitler regretted the deal he made with Neville Chamberlain at Munich in 1938. What he actually wanted was war\u2014his goal was to conquer all of Czechoslovakia by force as a first step toward the conquest of all of Europe. He didn\u2019t […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1001004,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[53],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16162"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1001004"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=16162"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16162\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":16163,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/16162\/revisions\/16163"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=16162"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=16162"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=16162"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}