{"id":17059,"date":"2025-10-26T00:28:11","date_gmt":"2025-10-26T07:28:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/?p=17059"},"modified":"2025-10-28T00:34:40","modified_gmt":"2025-10-28T07:34:40","slug":"could-the-internet-go-offline-inside-the-fragile-system-holding-the-modern-world-together-the-guardian","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/?p=17059","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Could the internet go offline? Inside the fragile system holding the modern world together&#8221;, The Guardian"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Behind every meme and message is creaking, decades-old infrastructure. Internet experts can think of scenarios that could bring it all crashing down \u2026<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/profile\/aisha-down\">Aisha Down<\/a>, London, Sun 26 Oct 2025<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is the morning after the internet went offline and, as much as you would like to think you would be delighted, you are likely to be wondering what to do.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>You could buy groceries with a chequebook, if you have one. Call into work with the landline \u2013 if yours is still connected. After that, you could drive to the shop, as long as you still know how to navigate without 5G.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A glitch at a datacentre in the US state of Virginia this week reminded us that the unlikely is not impossible. The internet may have become an irreplaceable linchpin of modern life, but it is also a web of creaking legacy programs and physical infrastructure, leading some to wonder what it would take to bring it all down.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The answer could be as simple as some acute bad luck, a few targeted attacks, or both. Extreme weather takes out a few key datacentres. A line of AI-written code deep in a major provider \u2013 such as Amazon, Google or&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/microsoft\">Microsoft<\/a>&nbsp;\u2013 is triggered unexpectedly and causes a cascading software crash. An armed group or intelligence agency snips a<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>couple of undersea cables.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\" id=\"e7d10b03-db21-476d-8de4-524d06b7461c\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2025\/oct\/20\/amazon-web-services-aws-outage-hits-dozens-websites-apps\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i.guim.co.uk\/img\/media\/2043251fecc4cb433acb94649126fd2555f30433\/509_0_5031_4024\/master\/5031.jpg?width=460&amp;quality=85&amp;auto=format&amp;fit=max&amp;s=f030128e9df18a3b5fe558726940dc13\" alt=\"Amazon Web Services (AWS) logo on a display\"\/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>These would be bad. But the real doomsday event, the kind that the world\u2019s few internet experts still worry about in private Slack groups, is slightly different \u2013 a sudden, snowballing error in the creaky, decades-old protocols that underlie the whole internet. Think of the plumbing that directs the flow of connection, or the address books that allow one machine to locate another.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We\u2019ll call it \u201cthe big one\u201d and if it were to happen then at the very least, you would need your chequebook.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The big one could start<strong>&nbsp;<\/strong>when a summertime tornado cruises through the town of Council Bluffs, Iowa, laying waste to a low-slung cluster of datacentres that are an integral part of Google\u2019s offering.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This area, called us-central1, is a Google datacentre cluster, critical to its Cloud Platform as well as YouTube and Gmail \u2013 a 2019&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/status.cloud.google.com\/incident\/cloud-networking\/19009\">outage<\/a>&nbsp;here&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.fierce-network.com\/cloud\/aws-gcp-and-more-are-down-heres-whats-happening\">downed<\/a>these services across the US and Europe.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dinners burn as YouTube cooking videos sputter to a halt. Workers across the world furiously refresh their suddenly inaccessible emails, then resign themselves to interacting in person. Senior US officials notice some government services have slowed, before returning to planning a new blitz over Signal.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>All this is inconvenient, but nowhere near the end of the internet. \u201cTechnically, if we have two networked devices and a router between them, the internet is running,\u201d says Micha\u0142 \u201crysiek\u201d Wo\u017aniak, who works in DNS, the system involved in this week\u2019s outage.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But there is \u201cabsolutely a lot of concentration happening on the internet\u201d, says Steven Murdoch, a professor of computer science at University College London. \u201cThis happens with economics. It\u2019s just cheaper to run all things in the same place.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But what if then a heatwave in the eastern US takes out US East-1, part of a Virginia complex that hosts \u201cdatacenter alley\u201d, a key hub for Amazon Web Services (AWS), the focus of this week\u2019s outage \u2013 among a handful of its neighbours. Meanwhile, a cyberattack hits a major European cluster, say in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cbre.co.uk\/press-releases\/frankfurt-becomes-a-1gw-data-centre-market-narrowing-the-gap-with-london\">Frankfurt<\/a>\u00a0or London. In the wake of this, networks redirect traffic to secondary hubs, lesser-used datacentres, which like frontage roads in a Los Angeles traffic jam become quickly unusable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Or, if we stray from disaster movie to the perils of automation, the heightened traffic could trigger a bug in AWS\u2019s internal infrastructure rewritten by artificial intelligence months ago \u2013 perhaps one that went unnoticed&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theregister.com\/2025\/10\/20\/aws_outage_amazon_brain_drain_corey_quinn\/\">after<\/a>&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/business\/retail-consumer\/amazons-aws-cloud-computing-unit-cuts-least-hundreds-jobs-sources-say-2025-07-17\/\">hundreds<\/a>&nbsp;of AWS employees were let go this summer as part of the company\u2019s larger push towards automation. Overwhelmed by unfamiliar requests, AWS starts to tumble.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Signal goes down. So does Slack, Netflix and Lloyd\u2019s bank. Roomba vacuum cleaners fall silent. Smart mattresses go&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/quasa.io\/media\/the-strangest-fallout-from-the-aws-outage-smart-mattresses-go-rogue-and-ruin-sleep-worldwide\">rogue<\/a>&nbsp;and smart locks malfunction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/amazon\">Amazon<\/a>&nbsp;and Google taken out, the internet would look largely unfamiliar. AWS, Microsoft and Google together account for more than 60% of the world\u2019s cloud services market \u2013 and it is almost impossible to approximate how many services depend on them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cBut the internet at its very most rudimentary level is still working,\u201d says Doug Madory, an internet infrastructure expert who studies disruptions. \u201cYou just can\u2019t do anything that you\u2019re used to on the internet because that\u2019s all posted out of these datacenters.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>You may think that the biggest threat is an attack on an undersea cable. This excites Washington thinktanks, but otherwise achieves little. Undersea cables break regularly, says Madory \u2013 in fact, the UN estimates there are 150 to 200 faults a year.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cYou\u2019d really have to take out a bunch to affect communication. I think the submarine cable industry would tell you: dude, we do this all the time.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Then an anonymous hacking group mounts an attack on a DNS service provider \u2013 one of the phone books of the internet. Verisign, for example, handles every online site that ends with a certain \u201c.com\u201d, or \u201c.net\u201d. Ultranet, another one, handles \u201c.biz\u201d and \u201c.us\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Madory says it is extremely unlikely that one of them could ever be taken out. \u201cIf something were to happen to Verisign, .com would be gone. They have a huge financial incentive to make sure that never happens.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\" id=\"0df5d2bf-88bd-4ddf-8662-2656a83ed3ea\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2025\/oct\/26\/internet-infrastructure-fragile-system-holding-modern-world-together#img-3\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/i.guim.co.uk\/img\/media\/767e13f1f4db69dcfed6ba7c6f71a8abd1696ebf\/0_0_6718_4478\/master\/6718.jpg?width=445&amp;dpr=1&amp;s=none&amp;crop=none\" alt=\"A silhouette hand holding a phone showing the google, apple, meta, amazon and microsoft logos on it\"\/><\/a><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">AWS, Microsoft and Google together account for more than 60% of the world\u2019s cloud services market.&nbsp;Photograph: S\u00e9bastien Bozon\/AFP\/Getty Images<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>But it would take an error of that scale, one that implicates more fundamental infrastructure than Amazon and Google, to truly devastate the broader ecosystem. If it happened, it would be unprecedented \u2013 the closest analogy could be the 2016&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/archive.ph\/Hh85j\">attack<\/a>&nbsp;on Dyn, a smaller DNS service provider, which&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/technology\/2016\/oct\/26\/ddos-attack-dyn-mirai-botnet\">downed<\/a>&nbsp;the Guardian, X and others.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With .com out, banks, hospitals, financial services and most communication platforms would be out. Some government internet infrastructure would still be there, such as the US\u2019s secure messaging system&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2010\/nov\/28\/siprnet-america-stores-secret-cables\">Siprnet<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>And \u2013 at least to a wonkish community of experts \u2013 there would still be the internet. There are self-hosted blogs, after all, and decentralised social platforms such as Mastodon, and niche domains including \u201c.io\u201d, for the British Indian Ocean, and \u201c.is\u201d for Iceland.<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2025\/oct\/22\/the-guardian-view-on-the-cloud-crash-an-outage-that-showed-who-really-runs-the-internet\"><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2025\/oct\/22\/the-guardian-view-on-the-cloud-crash-an-outage-that-showed-who-really-runs-the-internet\">The Guardian view on the cloud crash: an outage that showed who really runs the internet<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2025\/oct\/22\/the-guardian-view-on-the-cloud-crash-an-outage-that-showed-who-really-runs-the-internet\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Murdoch and Madory can think of scenarios that would devastate the rest. Murdoch suggests a bug in BIND, the software&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.isc.org\/bind\/\">language<\/a>&nbsp;that supports DNS. Madory points at&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=VVJldn_MmMY\">testimony<\/a>&nbsp;from a group of Massachusetts hackers who in 1998 told the US Congress about a vulnerability that could \u201ctake down the internet in 30 minutes\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>That vulnerability involved a system one level up from DNS: the border gateway protocol, which directs all traffic on the internet. This is extremely unlikely, says Madory \u2013 such an event would be an \u201call hands on deck\u201d scenario, and the protocol is \u201csuper resilient, otherwise it would have crashed by now\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If the internet were ever fully shut down, it is unclear if it could be started up again, says Murdoch. \u201cNo one has turned off the internet after it\u2019s been turned on. No one is really sure how it could be turned on again.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the UK, there is a non-virtual contingency plan, or at least there was. If the internet shuts down, the people who know how it works will meet up in a pub outside London and decide what to do, says Murdoch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cI don\u2019t know if this is still the case. It was quite a few years ago and I was never told which pub it was.\u201d<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Behind every meme and message is creaking, decades-old infrastructure. Internet experts can think of scenarios that could bring it all crashing down \u2026 Aisha Down, London, Sun 26 Oct 2025 It is the morning after the internet went offline and, as much as you would like to think you would be delighted, you are likely [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1001004,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[53],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17059"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1001004"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17059"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17059\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17060,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17059\/revisions\/17060"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17059"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17059"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17059"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}