{"id":1852,"date":"2017-08-01T03:45:08","date_gmt":"2017-08-01T10:45:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/?p=1852"},"modified":"2017-08-01T03:45:08","modified_gmt":"2017-08-01T10:45:08","slug":"popularity-of-brazils-president-temer-plummets-to-five-percent-the-rio-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/?p=1852","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Popularity of Brazil\u2019s President Temer Plummets to Five Percent&#8221;, The Rio Times"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By Lise Alves, July 28, 2017<\/p>\n<p>The latest survey shows the lowest positive rate for a Brazilian President since the country\u2019s return to democracy in the 1980\u2019s.<\/p>\n<p>S\u00c3O PAULO, BRAZIL \u2013 The government of Brazilian President Michel Temer was considered bad or very bad by seventy percent of the population, says a study released by CNI\/Ibopeon Thursday.<\/p>\n<div class=\"td-post-content\">\n<p>Only five percent consider it good or very good, the lowest positive rate for a Brazilian President since the country\u2019s return to democracy in the 1980\u2019s.<\/p>\n<p>The CNI (National Industry Confederation)-Ibope survey for the second quarter of 2017 was held between July 13 and 16, and interviewed 2,000 people in 125 municipalities.<\/p>\n<p>In the previous <a href=\"http:\/\/riotimesonline.com\/brazil-news\/rio-politics\/brazil-president-temer-faces-55-percent-disapproval\/\" target=\"_blank\">survey<\/a>, released in March 2017, ten percent of respondents rated the government as good or very good, 31 percent as regular, 55 percent as bad or very bad, and 4 percent did not know or did not respond.<\/p>\n<p>According to CNI\u2019s Research and Competitiveness executive manager, Renato da Fonseca, the low popularity of the Temer government was influenced by the accusations of <a href=\"http:\/\/riotimesonline.com\/brazil-news\/rio-politics\/brazils-president-temer-dodges-corruption-charges-in-congress\/\" target=\"_blank\">corruption<\/a> disclosed by businessman Joesley Batista earlier this year and the difficulties the government has been facing in the economic front.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe economic situation certainly weighed (negatively) on the assessment of the President. While inflation and interest rates are falling, unemployment remains high and the population continue to see a rise in prices,\u201d Fonseca told journalists.<\/p>\n<p>According to the CNI executive the political <a href=\"http:\/\/riotimesonline.com\/brazil-news\/rio-politics\/uproar-over-disbursement-of-funds-by-brazils-president-temer\/\" target=\"_blank\">turbulence<\/a> faced by the current administration combined with the slow economic recovery seen in the country contributed to one of the lowest popularity rates for any President in Brazil in recent history.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn terms of bad or very bad, it (latest poll) is as bad as at the end of the Sarney Government (1989) and of President Rousseff\u2019s government right before her impeachment, seventy percent,\u201d concluded Fonseca.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/riotimesonline.com\/brazil-news\/rio-politics\/popularity-of-brazils-president-plummets-to-five-percent\/\">The Rio Times<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Lise Alves, July 28, 2017 The latest survey shows the lowest positive rate for a Brazilian President since the country\u2019s return to democracy in the 1980\u2019s. S\u00c3O PAULO, BRAZIL \u2013 The government of Brazilian President Michel Temer was considered bad or very bad by seventy percent of the population, says a study released by [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1001004,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[53],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1852"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1001004"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1852"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1852\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1853,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1852\/revisions\/1853"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1852"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1852"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1852"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}