By Michael S. Schmidt and Maggie Haberman, Front Page Lead, January 26, 2018<\/p>\n
WASHINGTON \u2014 President Trump ordered the firing last June of Robert S. Mueller III, the special counsel overseeing the Russia investigation, according to four people told of the matter, but ultimately backed down after the White House counsel threatened to resign rather than carry out the directive.<\/p>\n
The West Wing confrontation marks the first time Mr. Trump is known to have tried to fire the special counsel. Mr. Mueller learned about the episode in recent months as his investigators interviewed current and former senior White House officials in his inquiry into whether the president obstructed justice.<\/p>\n
Amid the first wave of news media reports<\/a> that Mr. Mueller was examining a possible obstruction case, the president began to argue that Mr. Mueller had three conflicts of interest that disqualified him from overseeing the investigation, two of the people said.<\/p>\n First, he claimed that a dispute<\/a> years ago over fees at Trump National Golf Club in Sterling, Va., had prompted Mr. Mueller, the F.B.I. director at the time, to resign his membership. The president also said Mr. Mueller could not be impartial because he had most recently worked for the law firm that previously represented the president\u2019s son-in-law<\/a>, Jared Kushner. Finally, the president said, Mr. Mueller had been interviewed to return as the F.B.I. director the day before he was appointed special counsel in May.<\/p>\n After receiving the president\u2019s order to fire Mr. Mueller, the White House counsel, Donald F. McGahn II, refused to ask the Justice Department to dismiss the special counsel, saying he would quit instead, the people said. They spoke on the condition of anonymity because they did not want to be identified discussing a continuing investigation.<\/p>\n Mr. McGahn disagreed with the president\u2019s case and told senior White House officials that firing Mr. Mueller would have a catastrophic effect on Mr. Trump\u2019s presidency. Mr. McGahn also told White House officials that Mr. Trump would not follow through on the dismissal on his own. The president then backed off.<\/p>\n The president dismissed the revelations on Friday, when asked about them by reporters as he arrived at the Congress Center in Davos, Switzerland, for meetings with world political and business leaders.<\/p>\n \u201cFake news, folks,\u201d Mr. Trump said. \u201cFake news. A typical New York Times fake story.\u201d<\/p>\n Ty Cobb, who manages the White House\u2019s relationship with Mr. Mueller\u2019s office, said in a statement, \u201cWe decline to comment out of respect for the Office of the Special Counsel and its process.\u201d<\/p>\n Mr. McGahn, a longtime Republican campaign finance lawyer in Washington who served on the Federal Election Commission, was the top lawyer on Mr. Trump\u2019s campaign. He has been involved in nearly every key decision Mr. Trump has made \u2014 like the firing of the former F.B.I. director \u2014 that is being scrutinized by Mr. Mueller.<\/p>\n Mr. McGahn was also concerned that firing the special counsel would incite more questions about whether the White House was trying to obstruct the Russia investigation.<\/p>\n Around the time Mr. Trump wanted to fire Mr. Mueller, the president\u2019s legal team, led then by his longtime personal lawyer in New York, Marc E. Kasowitz, was taking an adversarial approach to the Russia investigation. The president\u2019s lawyers were digging into potential conflict-of-interest issues for Mr. Mueller and his team, according to current and former White House officials, and news media reports revealed that several of Mr. Mueller\u2019s prosecutors had donated to Democrats<\/a>.<\/p>\n Mr. Mueller could not legally have considered political affiliations when making hiring decisions. But for Mr. Trump\u2019s supporters, it reinforced the idea that, although Mr. Mueller is a Republican, he had assembled a team of Democrats to take down the president.<\/p>\n Another option that Mr. Trump considered in discussions with his advisers was dismissing the deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, and elevating the Justice Department\u2019s No. 3 official, Rachel Brand, to oversee Mr. Mueller. Mr. Rosenstein has overseen the investigation since March, when Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself<\/a>.<\/p>\n Mr. Trump has significantly ratcheted back his criticisms of Mr. Mueller since he hired Mr. Cobb<\/a> for his legal team in July. A veteran of several high-profile Washington controversies, Mr. Cobb has known Mr. Mueller for decades, dating to their early careers in the Justice Department.<\/p>\n He advised Mr. Trump that he had nothing to gain from combat with Mr. Mueller, a highly respected former prosecutor and F.B.I. director who has subpoena power as special counsel. Since Mr. Cobb\u2019s arrival, the White House has operated on the premise that the quickest way to clear the cloud of suspicion was to cooperate with Mr. Mueller, not to fight him.<\/p>\n Nonetheless, Mr. Trump has wavered for months about whether he wants to fire Mr. Mueller, which is an omnipresent concern among the president\u2019s legal team and close aides. The White House has denied nearly a dozen times since June that Mr. Trump was considering firing Mr. Mueller. The president\u2019s lawyers, including Mr. Cobb, have tried to keep Mr. Trump calm by assuring him for months, amid new revelations about the inquiry, that it is close to ending.<\/p>\n Mr. Trump has long demonstrated a preoccupation with those who have overseen the Russia investigation. In March, after Mr. McGahn failed to persuade Attorney General Jeff Sessions not to recuse himself from the inquiry, Mr. Trump complained that he needed someone loyal to oversee the Justice Department.<\/p>\n The former F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, said Mr. Trump asked him for loyalty and encouraged him to drop an investigation into his former national security adviser, Michael T. Flynn. Mr. Comey said he sidestepped those requests. He was soon fired<\/a>.<\/p>\n In an interview<\/a> with The New York Times in the Oval Office in July, the president pointedly kept open the option of firing Mr. Mueller, saying that the special counsel would be passing a red line if his investigation expanded to look at Mr. Trump\u2019s finances. Mr. Trump said he never would have made Mr. Sessions the attorney general if he had known he would recuse himself from the investigation.<\/p>\n Last month, as Republicans were increasing their attacks on the special counsel, Mr. Trump said in an interview<\/a> with The Times that he believed Mr. Mueller was going to treat him fairly.<\/p>\n \u201cNo, it doesn\u2019t bother me because I hope that he\u2019s going to be fair,\u201d Mr. Trump said in response to a question about whether it bothered him that Mr. Mueller had not yet ended his investigation. \u201cI think that he\u2019s going to be fair.\u201d<\/p>\n Mr. Trump added: \u201cThere\u2019s been no collusion. But I think he\u2019s going to be fair.\u201d<\/p>\n