Jayashree Nandi, New Delhi, Jun 23, 2018<\/p>\n
NEW DELHI: The Central Pollution Control Board\u2019s guidelines<\/a> for the continuous emission monitoring systems<\/a>(CEMS) of industries<\/a> are not consistent<\/a> with the comprehensive action plan<\/a> for air pollution control<\/a> in the national capital region (NCR).<\/p>\n While the action plan, drafted by CPCB and the Supreme Court-mandated environment pollution control authority (EPCA), underlined that the CEMS data would be available on an open platform for public scrutiny, the recent guidelines stated that the data would be shared continuously only with the state and central pollution control boards for corrective action.<\/p>\n CPCB, in 2014, issued directions under Section 18(1)b of the water and air acts to all state pollution control boards to direct \u2018red-category\u2019, highly polluting industries (such as pulp and paper, sugar, cement, oil refineries and pharma) to install online emission monitoring systems. But compliance was slow. Recently, CPCB directed all such industries in NCR to install CEMS and connect them to the board\u2019s server by March 31. CPCB is still in the process of ensuring compliance to this order.<\/p>\n While the idea behind installing CEMS is to ensure that industrial emissions meet norms and are transparently monitored, lack of transparency in transmitting the data has been making the compliance difficult. The data of Sterlite Copper in Tuticorin, which was closed by the Tamil Nadu government following protests, was not in public domain after its closure, making it difficult for the affected residents to verify emission levels from the plant. Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board (TNPCB) claimed that it was transmitting the CEMS data while the plant was open but the historical data was not in public domain.<\/p>\n CPCB\u2019s guidelines emphasised on bringing self-discipline in the industries rather than strict monitoring that CEMS is supposed to ensure. CEMS, it said, may be used for \u201cstrengthening the monitoring and compliance through a self-regulatory mechanism\u2026Efforts need to be made to bring discipline in the industries to exercise self-monitoring and compliance\u201d. The CPCB-empanelled laboratories will be engaged as third party agencies for all activities related to installation, calibration and validation of the CEMS data.<\/p>\n \u201cComprehensive Action Plan has provided for sharing of CEMS information with public and keep emission data on an open platform progressively. This is already a law here. But this point which is important for transparent and effective compliance and monitoring has been missed out in the new guidelines,\u201d said Anumita Roy Chowdhury, executive director, Centre for Science and Environment (CSE).<\/p>\n