By Laurie Goodstein and Sharon Otterman, Aug. 14, 2018<\/p>\n
Bishops and other leaders of the Roman Catholic Church in Pennsylvania covered up child sexual abuse by more than 300 priests over a period of 70 years, persuading victims not to report the abuse and law enforcement not to investigate it, according to a searing report issued by a grand jury<\/a> on Tuesday.<\/p>\n The report, which covered six of the state\u2019s eight Catholic dioceses and found more than 1,000 identifiable victims, is the broadest examination yet by a government agency in the United States of child sexual abuse in the Catholic Church. The report said there are likely thousands more victims whose records were lost or who were too afraid to come forward.<\/p>\n It catalogs horrific instances of abuse: a priest who raped a young girl in the hospital after she had her tonsils out; a victim tied up and whipped with leather straps by a priest; and another priest who was allowed to stay in ministry after impregnating a young girl and arranging for her to have an abortion.<\/p>\n The sexual abuse scandal has shaken the Catholic Church for more than 15 years, ever since explosive allegations emerged out of Boston in 2002. But even after paying billions of dollars in settlements and adding new prevention programs, the church has been dogged by a scandal that is now reaching its highest ranks. The Pennsylvania report comes soon after the resignation of Cardinal Theodore E. McCarrick<\/a>, the former archbishop of Washington, who is accused of sexually abusing young priests and seminarians, as well as minors.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n \u201cDespite some institutional reform, individual leaders of the church have largely escaped public accountability,\u201d the grand jury wrote. \u201cPriests were raping little boys and girls, and the men of God who were responsible for them not only did nothing; they hid it all. For decades.\u201d<\/p>\n The grand jury said that while some accused priests were removed from ministry, the church officials who protected them remained in office or even got promotions. One bishop named in the report as vouching for an abusive priest was Cardinal Donald Wuerl, now the archbishop of Washington. \u201cUntil that changes, we think it is too early to close the book on the Catholic Church sex scandal,\u201d the jury wrote.<\/p>\n The report is unlikely to lead to new criminal charges or civil lawsuits under the current law because the statute of limitations has expired. Only two of the cases in the report so far have led to criminal charges.<\/p>\n In statements released on Tuesday, Pennsylvania\u2019s Catholic bishops called for prayers for victims and for the church, promised greater openness and said that measures instituted in recent years were already making the church safer.<\/p>\n But several bishops, including Bishop David A. Zubik of Pittsburgh, rejected the idea the church had concealed abuse.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n \u201cThere was no cover-up going on,\u201d Bishop Zubik said in a news conference on Tuesday. \u201cI think that it\u2019s important to be able to state that. We have over the course of the last 30 years, for sure, been transparent about everything that has in fact been transpiring.\u201d<\/p>\n Church officials followed a \u201cplaybook for concealing the truth,\u201d the grand jury said, minimizing the abuse by using words like \u201cinappropriate contact\u201d instead of \u201crape\u201d; assigning priests untrained in sexual abuse cases to investigate their colleagues; and not informing the community of the real reasons behind removing an accused priest.<\/p>\n \u201cTell his parishioners that he is on \u2018sick leave,\u2019 or suffering from \u2018nervous exhaustion.\u2019 Or say nothing at all,\u201d the report said.<\/p>\n Attorney General Josh Shapiro, whose office initiated the investigation, said in a news conference, \u201cThey protected their institution at all costs. As the grand jury found, the church showed a complete disdain for victims.\u201d<\/p>\n He said that the cover-up by senior church officials \u201cstretched in some cases all the way up to the Vatican.\u201d<\/p>\n No other state has seen more grand jury investigations of abuses in the church than Pennsylvania, where about one of every four residents is Catholic<\/a> and the local attorneys general have been particularly responsive to victims. Previous grand juries examined the dioceses of Philadelphia and Altoona-Johnstown; the new report covers the rest of the state.<\/p>\n Mr. Shapiro was surrounded on Tuesday by about 20 abuse victims and their family members, who gasped and wept when he revealed that one priest had abused five sisters in the same family, including one girl beginning when she was 18 months old.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Some victims said in interviews that they were relieved to finally be heard and to have their perpetrators publicly named.<\/p>\n \u201cI had gone to two bishops with allegations over five years, and they ignored and downplayed my allegations,\u201d said the Rev. James Faluszczak, an Erie priest on extended leave who was abused as a child and who testified before the grand jury. \u201cIt\u2019s that very management of secrets that has given cover to predators.\u201d<\/p>\n For others, it was too little, too late. Frances Samber, whose brother Michael was abused by a priest in Pittsburgh and committed suicide in 2010, said, \u201cIt\u2019s good that the public sees this, but where is the justice? What do you do about it? Why aren\u2019t these people in prison?\u201d<\/p>\n There has been no comprehensive measurement of the full scope of child sexual abuse in the Catholic Church in the United States, though some<\/a>have<\/a> tried<\/a>. American abuse survivors have pushed for years for the government to undertake a nationwide inquiry similar to the one conducted in Australia, where a royal commission<\/a> spent four years examining the sexual abuse of children by a variety of religious and civic institutions, including the Catholic Church.<\/p>\n There have been 10 previous reports by grand juries and attorneys general<\/a>in the United States, according to the research and advocacy group BishopAccountability.org, but those examined single dioceses or counties.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n The Pennsylvania grand jury report lands as the sex abuse scandal in the church has reached a new stage, with calls to discipline bishops who sexually abused younger priests and seminarians, or who have covered up for abusive colleagues.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Catholics are calling for independent investigations into why Cardinal McCarrick was advanced up the hierarchy despite warnings<\/a> to his superiors in Rome and fellow bishops that he had molested seminarians and young priests. Cardinal McCarrick resigned in July over allegations of sexually abusing minors<\/a>, but since then priests in the diocese of Lincoln, Nebraska<\/a>, and seminarians in Boston<\/a> and elsewhere have publicly accused their superiors of turning a blind eye to sexual misconduct.<\/p>\n The Pennsylvania grand jury met for two years, reviewed 500,000 documents from dioceses\u2019 secret archives, and heard testimony from dozens of victims and the bishop of Erie. The report covers the dioceses of Allentown, Erie, Greensburg, Harrisburg, Pittsburgh and Scranton. Two of the dioceses \u2014 Greensburg and Harrisburg \u2014 tried to quash the grand jury investigation last year, but later backed off that stance.<\/p>\n The report lists each of the accused priests and documents how they were sent from parish to parish, and even sometimes out of state. The grand jury said that while the list is long, \u201cwe don\u2019t think we got them all.\u201d The report added, \u201cWe feel certain that many victims never came forward, and that the dioceses did not create written records every single time they heard something about abuse.\u201d<\/p>\n In the Greensburg diocese, the Rev. John Sweeney was charged by the attorney general\u2019s office with sexually abusing a boy in the early 1990s. Father Sweeney pleaded guilty this month and awaits sentencing. In the Erie diocese, the Rev. David Poulson was arrested in May and charged with sexually assaulting a boy for eight years, starting at age 8. Father Poulson has yet to enter a plea.<\/p>\n The Pennsylvania State Legislature has so far resisted calls to lift the statute of limitations, which has prevented childhood victims from filing civil lawsuits against the church after they turn 30. For many victims, it has taken decades to gain the courage to speak about the abuse, long past when the law would allow them to sue.<\/p>\n The grand jury and the attorney general strongly recommended that the statute of limitations be extended in civil and criminal cases. They recommended opening a temporary \u201cwindow\u201d that would permit older victims to file civil lawsuits against perpetrators, and the church.<\/p>\n The church has lobbied against any change to the statute or to open such a window, its efforts led by Bishop Ronald W. Gainer of Harrisburg, president of the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference. But abuse survivors and advocates say that in September they plan to begin a fresh campaign to press lawmakers and Bishop Gainer to drop their opposition.<\/p>\n \u201cIf this doesn\u2019t start a serious debate on the elimination of the statute of limitation, there\u2019s something seriously wrong with my fellow Pennsylvanians,\u201d said Shaun Dougherty, now 48, who testified before the Altoona-Johnstown grand jury about being abused by a priest for three years starting at age 10.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n About two dozen people named in the report petitioned the court to have their names redacted from it.<\/p>\n In the news conference, Mr. Shapiro, the attorney general, described the \u201cintense legal battle\u201d that played out over the last several months as some people named in the report appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to block its release.<\/p>\n \u201cThey wanted to cover up the cover-up,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n Mr. Shapiro said his office would continue to fight for a full version of the report to be released with no redactions.<\/p>\n One example of a cover-up detailed in the report concerns the Rev. Ernest Paone, a priest who was caught molesting boys and using guns with young children in Pittsburgh. A fellow pastor intervened in 1962 to stop the police from arresting him. The district attorney at the time, Robert Masters, wrote to the diocese in 1964 to say that he had halted his investigation of the case \u201cin order to prevent unfavorable publicity\u201d for the diocese.<\/p>\n In testimony before the grand jury, Mr. Masters said that he had wanted the church\u2019s support for his political career.<\/p>\n Father Paone was relocated successively to Los Angeles, San Diego and Reno in the following years, with Pittsburgh\u2019s bishops attesting to his fitness as a priest. Among those bishops was Cardinal Wuerl, now the archbishop of Washington. He accepted Father Paone\u2019s resignation from ministry in good standing in 2003, allowing him to collect his pension.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n Cardinal Wuerl released a letter to his priests<\/a> on Monday, saying that while the grand jury report would be \u201ccritical of some of my actions, I believe the report also confirms that I acted with diligence, with concern for the survivors and to prevent future acts of abuse.\u201d<\/p>\n As of Tuesday, all six of the dioceses covered by the report had released the names of priests with allegations against them.<\/p>\n