{"id":8190,"date":"2019-09-23T23:04:02","date_gmt":"2019-09-24T06:04:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/?p=8190"},"modified":"2019-09-24T04:47:17","modified_gmt":"2019-09-24T11:47:17","slug":"post3-60","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/?p=8190","title":{"rendered":"“Trump ordered hold on military aid days before calling Ukrainian president, officials say”, The Washington Post"},"content":{"rendered":"

By\u00a0Karoun Demirjian<\/span>,\u00a0<\/span>Josh Dawsey<\/span>,\u00a0<\/span>Ellen Nakashima<\/span> and\u00a0<\/span>Carol D. Leonnig, National Security, September 23, 2019<\/span><\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\u00a0President Trump told his acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, to hold back almost $400\u00a0million in military aid for Ukraine at least a week before a phone call in which Trump is said to have pressured the Ukrainian president to investigate the son of former vice president Joe Biden, according to three senior administration officials.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Officials at the Office of Management and Budget relayed Trump\u2019s order to the State Department and the Pentagon during an interagency meeting in mid-July, according to officials who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. They explained that the president had \u201cconcerns\u201d and wanted to analyze whether the money needed to be spent.<\/p>\n

Administration officials were instructed to tell lawmakers that the delays were part of an \u201cinteragency process\u201d but to give them no additional information \u2014 a pattern that continued for nearly two months, until the White House released the funds on the night of Sept. 11.<\/p>\n

Trump\u2019s order to withhold aid to Ukraine a week before his July 25 call with Volodymyr Zelensky is likely to raise questions about the motivation for his decision and fuel suspicions on Capitol Hill that Trump sought to leverage congressionally approved aid to damage a political rival. The revelation comes as lawmakers clash with the White House over a related whistleblower complaint made by an intelligence official alarmed by Trump\u2019s actions \u2014 and as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) is said to be exploring<\/a> whether it\u2019s time to allow impeachment proceedings.<\/p>\n

Trump denies explicitly tying U.S. military aid to demand for Ukrainian probe of Biden<\/a><\/p>\n

Republican senators on the Senate Appropriations Committee said Sept. 12 that the aid to Ukraine had been held up while the Trump administration explored whether Zelensky, the country\u2019s new president, was pro-Russian or pro-Western. They said the White House decided to release the aid after Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.) threatened to freeze $5 billion in Pentagon funding for next year unless the money for 2019 was distributed.<\/p>\n

One senior administration official said Monday that Trump\u2019s decision to hold back the funds was based on his concerns about there being \u201ca lot of corruption in Ukraine\u201d and that the determination to release the money was motivated by the fiscal year\u2019s looming close on Sept. 30.<\/p>\n

There was concern within the administration that if they did not spend the money, they would run afoul of the law, this official said, noting that, eventually, Trump gave the OMB\u2019s acting director, Russell Vought, permission to release the money. The official emphatically denied that there was any link between blocking the aid and pressing Zelensky into investigating the Bidens, stating: \u201cIt had nothing to do with a quid pro quo.\u201d<\/p>\n

But on Capitol Hill, Democrats were calling for an investigation of what they viewed as potential \u201cextortion,\u201d as Sen. Robert Menendez (N.J.), the Foreign Relations Committee\u2019s ranking Democrat, put it Monday. Trump, he said, is trying to \u201creshape American foreign policy\u201d to advance his personal and political goals.<\/p>\n

\u201cI don\u2019t think it really matters .\u2009.\u2009. whether the president explicitly told the Ukrainians that they wouldn\u2019t get their security aid if they didn\u2019t interfere in the 2020 elections,\u201d said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). \u201cThere is an implicit threat in every demand that a United States president makes of a foreign power. .\u2009.\u2009. That foreign country knows that if they don\u2019t do it, there are likely to be consequences.\u201d<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Trump administration again pushes limits of authority in shielding whistleblower complaint from Congress<\/a><\/p>\n

Trump on Monday repeated his denial of doing anything improper and insisted that his July\u00a025 conversation with Zelensky was \u201ca perfect phone call.\u201d He also hinted that he may release a transcript of it.<\/p>\n

White House spokesman Hogan Gidley rejected claims that Trump was engaged in a quid pro quo. \u201cBut because the media wants this story to be true so badly, they\u2019ll once again manufacture a frenzy and drive ignorant, fake stories to attack this president,\u201d Gidley said.<\/p>\n

It appears the Ukrainian leader came away from the discussion with a different impression. Murphy, who spoke with Zelensky during an early September visit to Ukraine, said Monday that the Ukrainian president \u201cdirectly\u201d expressed concerns at their meeting that \u201cthe aid that was being cut off to Ukraine by the president was a consequence\u201d of his unwillingness to launch an investigation into the Bidens.<\/p>\n

Hunter Biden served for nearly five years on the board of Burisma, Ukraine\u2019s largest private gas company, whose owner came under scrutiny by Ukrainian prosecutors for possible abuse of power and unlawful enrichment. Hunter Biden was not accused of any wrongdoing in the investigation. As vice president, Joe Biden pressured Ukraine to fire its top prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, who Biden and other Western officials said was not sufficiently pursuing corruption cases \u2014 at one point, threatening to withhold $1\u00a0billion in loan guarantees. At the time, the investigation into Burisma was dormant, according to former Ukrainian and U.S. officials.<\/p>\n

Trump\u2019s allies have frequently said he has been better about distributing military aid, and specifically lethal aid, to Ukraine than his predecessor. Yet according to Democratic and Republican aides, no administration has withheld funds as long and as mysteriously as the Trump administration did this year since the United States began helping Ukraine fend off Russian-backed separatists in the country\u2019s eastern provinces.<\/p>\n

Congressional officials were notified twice this year, on Feb.\u00a028 and again on May 23, that the administration intended to release large tranches of military aid to Ukraine. Congress approved two large pots of military aid for Ukraine during fiscal 2019: $250 million, to be managed by the Pentagon, for equipment such as sniper rifles, counter-artillery radar systems, ammunition and grenade launchers; and $141 million, to be funneled through the State Department, for maritime security, NATO interoperability and various initiatives to help Ukraine\u2019s military fend off Russian aggression.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Despite those notifications, the money was not transmitted until this month.<\/p>\n

According to administration officials, discussions about Ukrainian aid began in June. Withholding aid from foreign governments is something the president has frequently requested, such as with Central American countries when he said they were not doing their part to help the United States with immigrants amassing at the southern border.<\/p>\n

Former national security adviser John Bolton wanted to release the money to Ukraine because he thought it would help the country while curtailing Russian aggression. But Trump has said he was primarily concerned with corruption.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s very important to talk about corruption,\u201d Trump told reporters. \u201cIf you don\u2019t talk about corruption, why would you give money to a country that you think is corrupt?\u201d<\/p>\n

Besides Bolton, several other administration officials said they did not know why the aid was being canceled or why a meeting was not being scheduled.<\/p>\n

The decision was communicated to State and Defense officials on July 18, officials familiar with the meeting said.<\/p>\n

By mid-August, lawmakers were acutely aware that the OMB had assumed all decision-making authority from the Defense and State departments and was delaying the distribution of the aid through a series of short-term notices. Several congressional officials questioned whether the OMB had the legal authority to direct federal agencies not to spend money that Congress had already authorized, aides said.<\/p>\n

Spokespeople for the Pentagon and the State Department declined to comment.<\/p>\n

Mid-August is also when a whistleblower from the intelligence community filed a complaint regarding Trump and Ukraine to Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson. Atkinson informed the House and Senate intelligence committees of the complaint\u2019s existence Sept. 9 \u2014 the same day three House committees launched an investigation to determine whether Trump and his lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani, had improperly pushed Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.<\/p>\n

Capitol Hill has not been briefed on the details of the whistleblower complaint, on orders of the acting director of national intelligence, Joseph Maguire, who after consulting with the Justice Department and the White House declined to transmit the complaint to lawmakers. On Thursday, Maguire is set to testify publicly before the House Intelligence Committee and in a closed session before the Senate Intelligence Committee.<\/p>\n

Shane Harris, Anne Gearan and Paul Sonne contributed to this report.<\/em><\/p>\n

The Washington Post<\/a><\/p>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By\u00a0Karoun Demirjian,\u00a0Josh Dawsey,\u00a0Ellen Nakashima and\u00a0Carol D. Leonnig, National Security, September 23, 2019 \u00a0President Trump told his acting chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, to hold back almost $400\u00a0million in military aid for Ukraine at least a week before a phone call in which Trump is said to have pressured the Ukrainian president to investigate the son […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1001004,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[53],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8190"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1001004"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8190"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8190\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8193,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8190\/revisions\/8193"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8190"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8190"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/worldcampaign.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8190"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}